Jyothi Bastyav Louis W/o. Anil Teles, 41 yrs., R/o. Matadhitlu, Kaikini, Tq-Bhatkal vs Registrar of Birth and Death, Pattan Panchayat, Manki, Honnavar — 396/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KAUK620037372025

ORDERS

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

396/2025

Filing Date

08-12-2025

Registration No

396/2025

Registration Date

08-12-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

528-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT,HONAVARA

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3

Petitioner(s)

Jyothi Bastyav Louis W/o. Anil Teles, 41 yrs., R/o. Matadhitlu, Kaikini, Tq-Bhatkal

Adv. Sri Uday B Naik

Respondent(s)

Registrar of Birth and Death, Pattan Panchayat, Manki, Honnavar

Hearing History

Judge: 528-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT,HONAVARA

06-03-2026

ORDERS

03-02-2026

NOTICE

13-01-2026

NOTICE

08-12-2025

NOTICE

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 396/2025, the court adjourned the matter to 06-03-2026 for examination of the first witness. The court admitted the petitioner's affidavit in the main hearing conducted by Advocate U.B.N. On 14-11-2025, certified copies of identity documents (Aadhaar, Ration Card) were produced and verified against originals, marked as Exhibits 2-4. The petition was allowed, and since the opposing party did not contest, no objection was raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 396/2025, the court adjourned the matter to 06-03-2026 for examination of the first witness. The court admitted the petitioner's affidavit in the main hearing conducted by Advocate U.B.N. On 14-11-2025, certified copies of identity documents (Aadhaar, Ration Card) were produced and verified against originals, marked as Exhibits 2-4. The petition was allowed, and since the opposing party did not contest, no objection was raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case