Jyothi Bastyav Louis W/o. Anil Teles, 41 yrs., R/o. Matadhitlu, Kaikini, Tq-Bhatkal vs Registrar of Birth and Death, Pattan Panchayat, Manki, Honnavar — 396/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KAUK620037372025
Filing Number
396/2025
Filing Date
08-Dec-2025
Registration No
396/2025
Registration Date
08-Dec-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
528-Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Jyothi Bastyav Louis W/o. Anil Teles, 41 yrs., R/o. Matadhitlu, Kaikini, Tq-Bhatkal
Adv. Sri Uday B Naik
Respondent(s)
-
1.Registrar of Birth and Death, Pattan Panchayat, Manki, Honnavar
Case History
-
24-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 396/2025, the court adjourned the matter to 06-03-2026 for examination of the first witness. The court admitted the petitioner's affidavit in the main hearing conducted by Advocate U.B.N. On 14-11-2025, certified copies of identity documents (Aadhaar, Ration Card) were produced and verified against originals, marked as Exhibits 2-4. The petition was allowed, and since the opposing party did not contest, no objection was raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
03-Feb-2026
Notice
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
13-Jan-2026
Notice
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
08-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
08-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 396/2025
Case Summary In Criminal Case No. 396/2025, the court adjourned the matter to 06-03-2026 for examination of the first witness. The court admitted the petitioner's affidavit in the main hearing conducted by Advocate U.B.N. On 14-11-2025, certified copies of identity documents (Aadhaar, Ration Card) were produced and verified against originals, marked as Exhibits 2-4. The petition was allowed, and since the opposing party did not contest, no objection was raised. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts