Narayan Jayu Marati, 52 yrs., R/o. Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar, U.K., vs Registrar of Birth and Death Tahasildar Honavar — 387/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KAUK620036292025

ORDERS

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

387/2025

Filing Date

28-11-2025

Registration No

387/2025

Registration Date

28-11-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3

Petitioner(s)

Narayan Jayu Marati, 52 yrs., R/o. Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar, U.K.,

Adv. Uday S Naik

Respondent(s)

Registrar of Birth and Death Tahasildar Honavar

Shivu Jayu Marati, 42 yrs., Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar(Legal Heir)

Nagesh Jayu Marati, 63 yrs., R/o. Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-HonnavarAarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar

Hoya Jayu Marati(Legal Heir) 4.

Lakshmi Hoya Marati, 45 Yrs., Aarmudi, Hirebail, Honnavar

Savithri Rama Marati(Legal Heir)

Hearing History

Judge: 527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

06-03-2026

ORDERS

04-02-2026

PAPER PUBLICATION

07-01-2026

PAPER PUBLICATION

28-11-2025

NOTICE

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

Case Status Summary: In Criminal Case No. 387/2025, the witness was examined on 06-03-2026 and sworn affidavits were recorded. The court admitted evidence including documents marked as Exhibits 1-4, with the respondent remaining uncontested. The petition was allowed, and the court processed the case accordingly as per the statements made in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Status Summary: In Criminal Case No. 387/2025, the witness was examined on 06-03-2026 and sworn affidavits were recorded. The court admitted evidence including documents marked as Exhibits 1-4, with the respondent remaining uncontested. The petition was allowed, and the court processed the case accordingly as per the statements made in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case