Narayan Jayu Marati, 52 yrs., R/o. Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar, U.K., vs Registrar of Birth and Death Tahasildar Honavar — 387/2025
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3. Status: Orders. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS
CNR: KAUK620036292025
Filing Number
387/2025
Filing Date
28-Nov-2025
Registration No
387/2025
Registration Date
28-Nov-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
527-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,honavara
Last updated 19-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Narayan Jayu Marati, 52 yrs., R/o. Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar, U.K.,
Adv. Uday S Naik
Respondent(s)
-
1.Registrar of Birth and Death Tahasildar Honavar
-
2.Shivu Jayu Marati, 42 yrs., Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar(Legal Heir)
-
3.Nagesh Jayu Marati, 63 yrs., R/o. Aarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-HonnavarAarmudi, Hirebail, Mutta, Tq-Honnavar
-
4.Hoya Jayu Marati(Legal Heir) 4.
-
5.Lakshmi Hoya Marati, 45 Yrs., Aarmudi, Hirebail, Honnavar
-
6.Savithri Rama Marati(Legal Heir)
Case History
-
27-Mar-2026
Next hearingPending
-
06-Mar-2026
DepositionView PDF
Case Status Summary: In Criminal Case No. 387/2025, the witness was examined on 06-03-2026 and sworn affidavits were recorded. The court admitted evidence including documents marked as Exhibits 1-4, with the respondent remaining uncontested. The petition was allowed, and the court processed the case accordingly as per the statements made in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-Mar-2026
Orders
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,honavara
-
04-Feb-2026
Paper Publication
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,honavara
-
07-Jan-2026
Paper Publication
Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,honavara
-
28-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
28-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 387/2025
Case Status Summary: In Criminal Case No. 387/2025, the witness was examined on 06-03-2026 and sworn affidavits were recorded. The court admitted evidence including documents marked as Exhibits 1-4, with the respondent remaining uncontested. The petition was allowed, and the court processed the case accordingly as per the statements made in open court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts