Narayan Nagu Gouda, 36 yrs., R/o. Vandur, Duggur, Tq-Honnavar, U.K., vs Registrar of Birth and Death Tahasildar Honavar — 386/2025

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 27th March 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KAUK620036282025

ORDERS

Next Hearing

27th March 2026

Filing Number

386/2025

Filing Date

28-11-2025

Registration No

386/2025

Registration Date

28-11-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13,3

Petitioner(s)

Narayan Nagu Gouda, 36 yrs., R/o. Vandur, Duggur, Tq-Honnavar, U.K.,

Adv. Abhijeet Ratnakar Naik

Respondent(s)

Registrar of Birth and Death Tahasildar Honavar

Nagu Jattu Gouda, 79 yrs., R/o. Vandur, Duggur, Tq-Honnavar, U.K.,

Nagaveni Nagu Gouda, 51 yrs., R/o. Vandur, Duggur, Tq-Honnavar, U.K.,

Ganesh Nagu Gouda, 22 yrs., R/o. Vandur, Duggur, Tq-Honnavar, U.K.,

Hearing History

Judge: 527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

06-03-2026

ORDERS

05-03-2026

PAPER PUBLICATION

04-02-2026

PAPER PUBLICATION

07-01-2026

PAPER PUBLICATION

28-11-2025

NOTICE

Interim Orders

06-03-2026
Deposition

The petition is allowed. The court admitted the applicant's petition on 06-03-2026, recorded the witness's sworn testimony, and accepted supporting documents including Aadhar card (Exhibit 1), a certified copy (Exhibit 2), a government notification (Exhibit 3 and 3-a), and a family tree (Exhibit 4). Since the respondent did not contest the matter, the court granted the requested relief without opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The petition is allowed. The court admitted the applicant's petition on 06-03-2026, recorded the witness's sworn testimony, and accepted supporting documents including Aadhar card (Exhibit 1), a certified copy (Exhibit 2), a government notification (Exhibit 3 and 3-a), and a family tree (Exhibit 4). Since the respondent did not contest the matter, the court granted the requested relief without opposition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case