THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs GANESH RAMA GOUDA Advocate - Vikram R. Naik — 1004/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2). Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 29th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK620021072025
e-Filing Number
25-06-2025
Filing Number
988/2025
Filing Date
25-Jun-2025
Registration No
1004/2025
Registration Date
25-Jun-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
528-Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0098
Police Station
MANKI PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. Assistant Public Prosecuter
Respondent(s)
-
1.GANESH RAMA GOUDA Advocate - Vikram R. Naik
-
2.NAGARAJ MANJU GOUDA
Adv. Vikram R. Naik
Case History
-
29-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
28-Apr-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
06-Feb-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
07-Jan-2026
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
30-Oct-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
25-Sep-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
19-Aug-2025
Evidence
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
25-Jul-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: CC No. 1004/2025 Outcome: Bail granted. The court allowed the bail application filed by accused No. 1 and 2 under Section 480 of BNSS, charged under Section 303(2) of BNS. Both accused were enlarged on bail on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of like amount, subject to stringent conditions including non-tampering with witnesses, appearing on all court dates, and not leaving court jurisdiction without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Jul-2025
Framing Of Charge Or Plea
Addl. CIVIL Judge And J.M.F.C Court,honavara
-
25-Jun-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Jun-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 1004/2025
Case Summary: CC No. 1004/2025 Outcome: Bail granted. The court allowed the bail application filed by accused No. 1 and 2 under Section 480 of BNSS, charged under Section 303(2) of BNS. Both accused were enlarged on bail on personal bonds of Rs. 50,000 each with one surety of like amount, subject to stringent conditions including non-tampering with witnesses, appearing on all court dates, and not leaving court jurisdiction without permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts