Shambhu Ishwar Gouda, A/a 60 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar vs Manju Govinda Gouda, A/a 65 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar — 49/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Sec.26Order7Rule1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK620013032025

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

16th June 2026

Filing Number

49/2025

Filing Date

15-03-2025

Registration No

49/2025

Registration Date

15-03-2025

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section Sec.26Order7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Shambhu Ishwar Gouda, A/a 60 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar

Adv. Ranganath M Bhat

Kanya Ishwar Gouda, A/a 56 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar

Respondent(s)

Manju Govinda Gouda, A/a 65 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar

Hearing History

Judge: 527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

06-02-2026

FOR MEDIATION

10-12-2025

EVIDENCE

28-10-2025

ISSUES

16-09-2025

ISSUES

Interim Orders

17-03-2025
Orders
16-09-2025
Orders

Case Summary: OS No. 49/2025 Outcome: The court DISMISSED the petitioners' interim injunction application (Interlocutory Application No. 3) filed under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2. Key Facts: Petitioners Shambhu Ishwar Gouda and Kanya Ishwar Gouda sought a temporary restraining order against respondent Manju Govinda Gouda to prevent him from interfering with their alleged exclusive possession of disputed agricultural land in Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar. The court found that petitioners failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case on first impression, (2) balance of convenience in their favor, and (3) irreparable harm if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 49/2025 Outcome: The court DISMISSED the petitioners' interim injunction application (Interlocutory Application No. 3) filed under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2. Key Facts: Petitioners Shambhu Ishwar Gouda and Kanya Ishwar Gouda sought a temporary restraining order against respondent Manju Govinda Gouda to prevent him from interfering with their alleged exclusive possession of disputed agricultural land in Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar. The court found that petitioners failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case on first impression, (2) balance of convenience in their favor, and (3) irreparable harm if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case