Shambhu Ishwar Gouda, A/a 60 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar vs Manju Govinda Gouda, A/a 65 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar — 49/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section Sec.26Order7Rule1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK620013032025
Next Hearing
16th June 2026
Filing Number
49/2025
Filing Date
15-03-2025
Registration No
49/2025
Registration Date
15-03-2025
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shambhu Ishwar Gouda, A/a 60 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar
Adv. Ranganath M Bhat
Kanya Ishwar Gouda, A/a 56 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar
Respondent(s)
Manju Govinda Gouda, A/a 65 yrs, R/at Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar
Hearing History
Judge: 527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA
EVIDENCE
FOR MEDIATION
EVIDENCE
ISSUES
ISSUES
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | FOR MEDIATION |
| 10-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-10-2025 | ISSUES |
| 16-09-2025 | ISSUES |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS No. 49/2025 Outcome: The court DISMISSED the petitioners' interim injunction application (Interlocutory Application No. 3) filed under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2. Key Facts: Petitioners Shambhu Ishwar Gouda and Kanya Ishwar Gouda sought a temporary restraining order against respondent Manju Govinda Gouda to prevent him from interfering with their alleged exclusive possession of disputed agricultural land in Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar. The court found that petitioners failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case on first impression, (2) balance of convenience in their favor, and (3) irreparable harm if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS No. 49/2025 Outcome: The court DISMISSED the petitioners' interim injunction application (Interlocutory Application No. 3) filed under CPC Order 39, Rules 1-2. Key Facts: Petitioners Shambhu Ishwar Gouda and Kanya Ishwar Gouda sought a temporary restraining order against respondent Manju Govinda Gouda to prevent him from interfering with their alleged exclusive possession of disputed agricultural land in Kelaginuru, Kerekodu, Honavar. The court found that petitioners failed to establish: (1) a prima facie case on first impression, (2) balance of convenience in their favor, and (3) irreparable harm if the injunction were denied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts