Venkataraman Narayan Shetty, Balegadde, Muguva, Honavar vs Nagaraj Mahabaleshwar Bhat, Bengre, Bhatkal Advocate - Mahabaleshwar S Bhat — 62/2017
Case under U/sec 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc Section ,. Status: HEARING. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK620009132017
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
62/2017
Filing Date
29-05-2017
Registration No
62/2017
Registration Date
29-05-2017
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
528-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT,HONAVARA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Venkataraman Narayan Shetty, Balegadde, Muguva, Honavar
Adv. Ganesh V Bhat
Respondent(s)
Nagaraj Mahabaleshwar Bhat, Bengre, Bhatkal Advocate - Mahabaleshwar S Bhat
Hearing History
Judge: 528-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT,HONAVARA
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-04-2026 | HEARING | |
| 07-03-2026 | HEARING | |
| 02-02-2026 | HEARING | |
| 27-11-2025 | HEARING | |
| 25-10-2025 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, permitting correction of the survey number of the property from Sy. No. 295/1 of Mugva village to Sy. No. 463B of Hosakuli village, which was a clerical mistake necessary to determine the real question in controversy. The amendment was granted subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and the plaintiff was directed to furnish the amended plaint on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the plaintiff's application to amend the plaint under Order 6 Rule 17 of the Civil Procedure Code, permitting correction of the survey number of the property from Sy. No. 295/1 of Mugva village to Sy. No. 463B of Hosakuli village, which was a clerical mistake necessary to determine the real question in controversy. The amendment was granted subject to a cost of Rs. 2,000, and the plaintiff was directed to furnish the amended plaint on the next date of hearing. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts