Primary Co-Op Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Branch Honavar vs Shridhar Parameshwar Hegde, A/a 30 Yrs R/a Vasa hegde, Nagare, Honnavar — 112/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 and 142. Disposed: Uncontested--REGISTERED AS C. C. on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

P.C.R. - PRIVATE COMPLAINT REGISTER

CNR: KAUK620009052026

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

13-Mar-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

13-Mar-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

527-Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,honavara

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--REGISTERED AS C. C.

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138 and 142

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Primary Co-Op Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Branch Honavar

    Adv. Suresh G Chandavar

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shridhar Parameshwar Hegde, A/a 30 Yrs R/a Vasa hegde, Nagare, Honnavar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    Deposition

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Orders

    The court took cognizance of the criminal complaint filed by Primary Co-Op Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Branch Honavar against Shridhar Parameshwar Hegde for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed after examining the complainant's sworn affidavit and supporting documents, and directed the office to register the case and issue summons to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Prl. CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court,honavara

  5. 13-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court took cognizance of the criminal complaint filed by Primary Co-Op Agriculture and Rural Development Bank Branch Honavar against Shridhar Parameshwar Hegde for an offence under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court found sufficient grounds to proceed after examining the complainant's sworn affidavit and supporting documents, and directed the office to register the case and issue summons to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case