Narayan Mahabaleshwar Bhagwat, Neelkod,Melinkere,Honavar(Legal Heir) vs Laxminarayan Mahabaleshwar Hegde, Neelkod, Bangarmakki,Honavar Advocate - Manjunath L Naik — 54/2017
Case under U/o 26 Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK620007882017
Next Hearing
25th April 2026
Filing Number
54/2017
Filing Date
27-04-2017
Registration No
54/2017
Registration Date
27-04-2017
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
528-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT,HONAVARA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Narayan Mahabaleshwar Bhagwat, Neelkod,Melinkere,Honavar(Legal Heir)
Adv. Mahabaleshwar S Bhat
Rama Krishna Bhagwat, Neelkod, Honavar
Respondent(s)
Laxminarayan Mahabaleshwar Hegde, Neelkod, Bangarmakki,Honavar Advocate - Manjunath L Naik
Subba Manja Hegde, Neelkod, Bangarmakki,Honavar(Legal Heir)
Grampanchayat, Kadle, Honavar(Legal Heir)
Subba Manja Hegde
Hearing History
Judge: 528-ADDL. CIVIL JUDGE AND J.M.F.C COURT,HONAVARA
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 07-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 24-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 17-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Court Order Summary Original Suit No. 54/2017 | Honawar Court The court conducted witness examination on 03-07-2025 regarding a property dispute involving Survey No. 135 in Neelkod village. The court found significant evidentiary issues: the plaintiff's witness could not clearly establish ownership rights, access routes, or boundaries to the disputed property, and testimony regarding alleged road construction and encroachments lacked credibility. The court noted contradictions between the witness statement and documentary evidence from the Gram Panchayat records regarding the actual boundaries and access paths to the suit land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Order Summary Original Suit No. 54/2017 | Honawar Court The court conducted witness examination on 03-07-2025 regarding a property dispute involving Survey No. 135 in Neelkod village. The court found significant evidentiary issues: the plaintiff's witness could not clearly establish ownership rights, access routes, or boundaries to the disputed property, and testimony regarding alleged road construction and encroachments lacked credibility. The court noted contradictions between the witness statement and documentary evidence from the Gram Panchayat records regarding the actual boundaries and access paths to the suit land. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts