Veena W/o Styani Luwis, D/o Salvador Pinto, a/ 37yrs, R/o Bengre-1, Sannabavi, Tq.Bhatkal. vs Registrar of Birth and Death,Tahasildar,Honavar — 82/2026

Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3). Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 01st April 2026.

Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS

CNR: KAUK620006842026

Case disposed

Filing Number

82/2026

Filing Date

27-02-2026

Registration No

82/2026

Registration Date

27-02-2026

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Acts & Sections

Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13(3)

Petitioner(s)

Veena W/o Styani Luwis, D/o Salvador Pinto, a/ 37yrs, R/o Bengre-1, Sannabavi, Tq.Bhatkal.

Adv. Shyamala N Naik

Respondent(s)

Registrar of Birth and Death,Tahasildar,Honavar

Hearing History

Judge: 527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

01-04-2026

Disposed

25-03-2026

ORDERS

13-03-2026

ORDERS

27-02-2026

NOTICE

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
Orders

Case Summary: 82/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed Veena Salvador Pinto's petition under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, Section 13(3), directing the Registrar to register her birth date as 11-05-1989 in Molkod village, Honavar taluk, and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and noted that while her birth wasn't originally registered in official records, supporting documents (Aadhaar and vaccination certificates) corroborated the stated birth date, making registration necessary for obtaining passport and other official documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 82/2026 Court Decision: The court allowed Veena Salvador Pinto's petition under the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, Section 13(3), directing the Registrar to register her birth date as 11-05-1989 in Molkod village, Honavar taluk, and issue a birth certificate. The court found the petitioner's testimony credible and noted that while her birth wasn't originally registered in official records, supporting documents (Aadhaar and vaccination certificates) corroborated the stated birth date, making registration necessary for obtaining passport and other official documents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case