SHIVA SUBRAY HEGDE , UFM vs JATTU BAIRU GOWDA Advocate - Shridhar G Hegde — 13/2017

Case under U/sec 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 06th July 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK620003072017

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

06th July 2026

Filing Number

13/2017

Filing Date

20-02-2017

Registration No

13/2017

Registration Date

20-02-2017

Court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

Acts & Sections

U/sec 26 and Order Vii Rule 1 of Cpc

Petitioner(s)

SHIVA SUBRAY HEGDE , UFM

Adv. Satish S Bhat

Respondent(s)

JATTU BAIRU GOWDA Advocate - Shridhar G Hegde

Hearing History

Judge: 527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA

04-06-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

21-01-2026

EVIDENCE

14-11-2025

EVIDENCE

23-10-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

18-12-2019
Deposition
06-04-2021
Deposition
06-04-2021
Issue
17-06-2022
Deposition
01-07-2023
Deposition
17-08-2023
Deposition
17-07-2025
Deposition

Case 13/2017 Summary: This is a property dispute case between Shiva Subray Hegde (petitioner) and Jattu Bairu Gowda. The court proceedings on 17.07.2025 involved witness examination and affidavit recording. The case concerns two land parcels: Schedule Property No. 1 with defined boundaries, and Schedule Property No. 2 which remains undivided and lacks clear information. The petitioner claims 65 years of possession and use of Property No. 2 with the respondent's consent. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case 13/2017 Summary: This is a property dispute case between Shiva Subray Hegde (petitioner) and Jattu Bairu Gowda. The court proceedings on 17.07.2025 involved witness examination and affidavit recording. The case concerns two land parcels: Schedule Property No. 1 with defined boundaries, and Schedule Property No. 2 which remains undivided and lacks clear information. The petitioner claims 65 years of possession and use of Property No. 2 with the respondent's consent. The case was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case