JANARDHAN SATHYAPPA NAIK vs GANESH GOVIND NAIK Advocate - M.N.Subramanya — 15/2018
Case under U/o 26 Order 7 Rule 1 and 2 of Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK620001452018
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
15/2018
Filing Date
30-01-2018
Registration No
15/2018
Registration Date
30-01-2018
Court
PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JANARDHAN SATHYAPPA NAIK
Adv. Vikram R. Naik
Respondent(s)
GANESH GOVIND NAIK Advocate - M.N.Subramanya
PURANDAR GOVIND NAIK
MADEV GOVIND NAIK
Adv. M.N.Subramanya
SUBHADRE KOM MANJUNATH NAIK
Adv. H Udaykumar Naik
YAMUNA HONNAPPA NAIK
Adv. H Udaykumar Naik
NAGAVENI KOM JATTI NAIK
Hearing History
Judge: 527-PRL. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT,HONAVARA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 24-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 28-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 18-07-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
This document appears to be only the issue framing/order of court dated 18th August 2021, not a final judgment. The court has identified seven key issues to be decided in the partition suit but has not yet issued a final order or decree. The case remains pending for adjudication on whether plaintiff Janardhan Sathyappa Naik constitutes a Hindu undivided family member with defendants, whether the property is ancestral/joint, and whether he is entitled to partition relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
This document appears to be only the issue framing/order of court dated 18th August 2021, not a final judgment. The court has identified seven key issues to be decided in the partition suit but has not yet issued a final order or decree. The case remains pending for adjudication on whether plaintiff Janardhan Sathyappa Naik constitutes a Hindu undivided family member with defendants, whether the property is ancestral/joint, and whether he is entitled to partition relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts