THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs MOHAMMAD RAHIK MOHAMMED GOUSE, AGE 23 YEARS, R/O KIDVAY ROAD, BHATGAV, TQ-BHATKAL — 584/2024

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),331(4),305. Status: Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 08th June 2026.

Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC Next hearing 08-Jun-2026 this date has passed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK610015202024

e-Filing Number

28-11-2024

Filing Number

584/2024

Filing Date

28-Nov-2024

Registration No

584/2024

Registration Date

28-Nov-2024

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

526-Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

0087

Police Station

MANKI PS

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 303(2),331(4),305

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

    Adv. ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MOHAMMAD RAHIK MOHAMMED GOUSE, AGE 23 YEARS, R/O KIDVAY ROAD, BHATGAV, TQ-BHATKAL

  2. 2.SHAFADA S/O MAHAMMED ISAQ, AGE 18 YEARSS, R/O MUDUGOPADI, KUNDAPURA.

Case History

  1. 08-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 25-May-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  3. 23-May-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  4. 02-May-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: State of Karnataka v. Mohammad Rahik Mohammed Gouse & Shafada (CC 584/2024) Outcome: Investigation completed; chargesheet filed against accused on 13-11-2024. The court examined witness testimony from a PSI regarding FIR No. 97/2024 (battery theft case). The accused were arrested after admitting involvement; a Swift car, two red batteries, and an iron rod were recovered. Scene inspection, photographs, and confessional statements were documented. One accused remains absent from proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  5. 02-May-2026

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  6. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  7. 27-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  8. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  9. 13-Mar-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  10. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  11. 28-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  12. 28-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

  13. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  14. 13-Feb-2026

    ChargeView PDF

  15. 13-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  16. 11-Feb-2026

    Issue NBW to Accused.

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  17. 08-Jan-2026

    Issue NBW to Accused.

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  18. 27-Nov-2025

    Issue NBW to Accused.

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  19. 17-Oct-2025

    Issue NBW to Accused.

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  20. 19-Sep-2025

    Issue NBW to Accused.

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  21. 21-Aug-2025

    Issue NBW to Accused.

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  22. 17-Jul-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  23. 19-Jun-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  24. 24-Apr-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  25. 20-Feb-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  26. 09-Jan-2025

    Summons

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  27. 28-Nov-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  28. 28-Nov-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 584/2024

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State of Karnataka v. Mohammad Rahik Mohammed Gouse & Shafada (CC 584/2024) Outcome: Investigation completed; chargesheet filed against accused on 13-11-2024. The court examined witness testimony from a PSI regarding FIR No. 97/2024 (battery theft case). The accused were arrested after admitting involvement; a Swift car, two red batteries, and an iron rod were recovered. Scene inspection, photographs, and confessional statements were documented. One accused remains absent from proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case