THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs ARUN KESHAV NAIK, AGE 52 YEARS, R/O CHANDAVARA NAKA, CHANDAVARA, TQ-HONNAVAR — 569/2024
Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 32,34. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 10th April 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK610014002024
e-Filing Number
10-09-2024
Filing Number
569/2024
Filing Date
10-Sep-2024
Registration No
569/2024
Registration Date
10-Sep-2024
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
526-Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
Decision Date
10-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
0181
Police Station
HONNAVAR PS
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
-
1.ARUN KESHAV NAIK, AGE 52 YEARS, R/O CHANDAVARA NAKA, CHANDAVARA, TQ-HONNAVAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Apr-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Case Summary: State of Karnataka v. Arun Keshav Naik (CC 569/2024) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Arun Keshav Naik of charges under the Karnataka Abkari Act, Sections 32 and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's evidence. The two main eyewitnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) testified that police did not produce any alcohol in their presence during the raid, contradicting the prosecution's narrative. Despite the investigating officer's testimony about the raid and seizure, the absence of corroborating testimony from the key witnesses who were present at the time created reasonable doubt about whether the accused actually possessed the liquor for illegal sale as alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
08-Apr-2026
Judgments
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
28-Mar-2026
Judgments
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgments
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
27-Feb-2026
313 StatementView PDF
-
27-Feb-2026
Arguments
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
13-Feb-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
23-Jan-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
09-Jan-2026
DepositionView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
26-Dec-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
11-Sep-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
11-Aug-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
21-Jul-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
21-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
05-Jul-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
13-Jun-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
02-May-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
02-May-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
24-Apr-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Apr-2025
DepositionView PDF
-
24-Apr-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
21-Mar-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
28-Feb-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
14-Feb-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
24-Jan-2025
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
19-Dec-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
14-Nov-2024
ChargeView PDF
-
14-Nov-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
19-Oct-2024
Evidence
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
04-Oct-2024
Call on
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
10-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 569/2024
Case Summary: State of Karnataka v. Arun Keshav Naik (CC 569/2024) Decision: The court acquitted the accused Arun Keshav Naik of charges under the Karnataka Abkari Act, Sections 32 and 34, finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. Key Reasoning: The court found critical weaknesses in the prosecution's evidence. The two main eyewitnesses (PW-1 and PW-2) testified that police did not produce any alcohol in their presence during the raid, contradicting the prosecution's narrative. Despite the investigating officer's testimony about the raid and seizure, the absence of corroborating testimony from the key witnesses who were present at the time created reasonable doubt about whether the accused actually possessed the liquor for illegal sale as alleged. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts