THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs RAMESH SUBRAY MUKRI, AGE 23 YEARS, R/O JANATA COLONY, CHANDAVAR, TQ-HONAVAR. Advocate - M.N.Subrahmanya — 69/2023
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304(A). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK610005202023
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
e-Filing Number
19-12-2023
Filing Number
69/2023
Filing Date
19-12-2023
Registration No
69/2023
Registration Date
21-12-2023
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
FIR Details
FIR Number
0078
Police Station
HONNAVAR PS
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. ASSISTANT PUBLIC PROSECUTOR
Respondent(s)
RAMESH SUBRAY MUKRI, AGE 23 YEARS, R/O JANATA COLONY, CHANDAVAR, TQ-HONAVAR. Advocate - M.N.Subrahmanya
VONODH MANJUNATH NAIK, AGE 31YEARS, R/O ABBHI, URKERI, TQ-KUMTA.
Hearing History
Judge: 526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 28-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 17-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
SUMMARY: The court (Senior Civil Judge and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Honnavara) in Criminal Case No. 69/2023 examined a witness (Santosh Kaykini, 43-year-old police inspector) on 21-02-2026 regarding charges related to a bike accident on 16-10-2023. On 24-10-2023, a charge sheet was filed against the accused. The court found insufficient evidence against the accused and no proper investigation was conducted, making the false charge sheet inappropriate, and accordingly rejected the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
SUMMARY: The court (Senior Civil Judge and First Class Judicial Magistrate, Honnavara) in Criminal Case No. 69/2023 examined a witness (Santosh Kaykini, 43-year-old police inspector) on 21-02-2026 regarding charges related to a bike accident on 16-10-2023. On 24-10-2023, a charge sheet was filed against the accused. The court found insufficient evidence against the accused and no proper investigation was conducted, making the false charge sheet inappropriate, and accordingly rejected the prosecution's case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts