CANARA BANK BRANCH-II, AT-BAZAR ROAD, HONAVAR vs Smt. Rubiya Mohammed Ali W/o Mohammed Ali D/o Ganguli Hasan, Age 34 Years, R/o Honnavar — 27/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U.OVII,Rule1,5,r/w26. Disposed: Uncontested--DECREED on 09th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK610004822025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
27/2025
Filing Date
06-12-2025
Registration No
27/2025
Registration Date
06-12-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
Decision Date
09th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DECREED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CANARA BANK BRANCH-II, AT-BAZAR ROAD, HONAVAR
Adv. Ramakant sadashiv Kamat
Respondent(s)
Smt. Rubiya Mohammed Ali W/o Mohammed Ali D/o Ganguli Hasan, Age 34 Years, R/o Honnavar
Hearing History
Judge: 526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
Disposed
JUDGMENTS
JUDGMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGMENTS | |
| 26-02-2026 | JUDGMENTS | |
| 23-02-2026 | EVIDENCE | |
| 09-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Honnavar decreed Canara Bank's suit against defendant Smt. Rubiya Mohammed Ali for recovery of Rs. 16,21,673/-, finding that she availed an overdraft loan of Rs. 15,00,000/- on 26-06-2023 for fishing business but failed to repay it as agreed. The defendant was directed to repay the loan amount within 60 days with interest at 11% per annum, with the court accepting the bank's unchallenged evidence since the defendant appeared ex-parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary: The Senior Civil Judge at Honnavar decreed Canara Bank's suit against defendant Smt. Rubiya Mohammed Ali for recovery of Rs. 16,21,673/-, finding that she availed an overdraft loan of Rs. 15,00,000/- on 26-06-2023 for fishing business but failed to repay it as agreed. The defendant was directed to repay the loan amount within 60 days with interest at 11% per annum, with the court accepting the bank's unchallenged evidence since the defendant appeared ex-parte. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts