Timmappa S/o Timmappa Gouda, Age 45 Years, R/o Mugli, Gunavante Village, Tq-Honnavar-581348 vs Shambhu S/o Manju Gouda, Age 60 Years, R/o Mugli, Gunavante Village, Tq-Honnavar — 9/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U.O 43, Rule 1(r). Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th March 2026.
M.A. - MISCELLANUOUS APPEALS
CNR: KAUK610004562025
Filing Number
9/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Registration No
9/2025
Registration Date
11-Nov-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
526-Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
Decision Date
13-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Timmappa S/o Timmappa Gouda, Age 45 Years, R/o Mugli, Gunavante Village, Tq-Honnavar-581348
Adv. Chandrashekar Gouda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shambhu S/o Manju Gouda, Age 60 Years, R/o Mugli, Gunavante Village, Tq-Honnavar
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: MA No. 09/2025 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Honnavar dismissed the appellant's miscellaneous appeal with costs, upholding the trial court's rejection of the temporary injunction application. Key Reasoning: The court found the appellant/plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for injunctive relief. The plaintiff claimed ownership of 3 acres based on an unregistered 1996 agreement to sell, but the original grantee held only 1 acre under temporary lagani (government grant). The court noted critical deficiencies: the unregistered agreement violates Section 17A of the Registration Act and Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act; no permanent lagani was ever granted; documents could not prove possession of the claimed 3 acres; and revenue authorities rejected the plaintiff's deforestation claims. The court cited Supreme Court precedent holding that plaintiffs cannot obtain relief for permanent injunction based on unregistered agreements to sell. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Mar-2026
Decree
-
13-Mar-2026
Disposed
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
28-Feb-2026
Order
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
11-Feb-2026
Order
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
31-Jan-2026
Order
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
17-Jan-2026
Order
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
03-Jan-2026
Order
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
06-Dec-2025
Order
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
22-Nov-2025
Hearing
Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara
-
12-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 9/2025
Case Summary: MA No. 09/2025 Court Decision: The Senior Civil Judge and JMFC Honnavar dismissed the appellant's miscellaneous appeal with costs, upholding the trial court's rejection of the temporary injunction application. Key Reasoning: The court found the appellant/plaintiff failed to establish a prima facie case for injunctive relief. The plaintiff claimed ownership of 3 acres based on an unregistered 1996 agreement to sell, but the original grantee held only 1 acre under temporary lagani (government grant). The court noted critical deficiencies: the unregistered agreement violates Section 17A of the Registration Act and Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act; no permanent lagani was ever granted; documents could not prove possession of the claimed 3 acres; and revenue authorities rejected the plaintiff's deforestation claims. The court cited Supreme Court precedent holding that plaintiffs cannot obtain relief for permanent injunction based on unregistered agreements to sell. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts