Veena Hanumant Naik, Age 50 Years, R/o Janata Plot No. 71, Melin Mudkani, Tq-Honnavar vs Anusuya Dharma Naik, Age 71 Years, R/o Tumbolli, Tq-Honnavar — 5/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U.O XLIII, Rule 1(r), r/w , Sec.104. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 07th March 2026.
M.A. - MISCELLANUOUS APPEALS
CNR: KAUK610003152025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
5/2025
Filing Date
28-07-2025
Registration No
5/2025
Registration Date
28-07-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
Decision Date
07th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Veena Hanumant Naik, Age 50 Years, R/o Janata Plot No. 71, Melin Mudkani, Tq-Honnavar
Adv. Shridhar Govind Hegde
Hanumant Shambhu Naik, Age 52 Years, R/o Janata Plot No.71, Melina Mudkani, Tq-Honnavar
Respondent(s)
Anusuya Dharma Naik, Age 71 Years, R/o Tumbolli, Tq-Honnavar
Hearing History
Judge: 526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
Disposed
ORDER
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 19-02-2026 | ORDER | |
| 16-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 11-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS | |
| 09-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Senior Civil Judge dismissed the defendants' appeal challenging the trial court's grant of temporary injunction to the plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience favors her, as a government-granted site (Plot No.9) was allocated to her husband and she possesses a repair license from the Panchayat, while the defendants failed to produce any evidence of ownership transfer. The appeal was dismissed with costs, upholding the temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's repair work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Senior Civil Judge dismissed the defendants' appeal challenging the trial court's grant of temporary injunction to the plaintiff. The court found that the plaintiff has a prima facie case and balance of convenience favors her, as a government-granted site (Plot No.9) was allocated to her husband and she possesses a repair license from the Panchayat, while the defendants failed to produce any evidence of ownership transfer. The appeal was dismissed with costs, upholding the temporary injunction restraining the defendants from interfering with the plaintiff's repair work. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts