State through Honavar P S vs Sajjad ahammed S/o Kutubuddin Ghani,Age-28 Years, R/o.Tohidmohalla,Chandavar,Honavar. Advocate - Krishna Venkatraman Naik — 89/2020
Case under Indian Penal Code Section U/s.457,380. Status: ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK610003062020
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
89/2020
Filing Date
08-12-2020
Registration No
89/2020
Registration Date
08-12-2020
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State through Honavar P S
Respondent(s)
Sajjad ahammed S/o Kutubuddin Ghani,Age-28 Years, R/o.Tohidmohalla,Chandavar,Honavar. Advocate - Krishna Venkatraman Naik
Mubasheer s/o Kutubuddin Ghani,Age-30 Years, R/o.Tohidmohalla,Chandavar.Honavar.
Hearing History
Judge: 526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 21-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 07-02-2026 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 31-12-2025 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
| 24-12-2025 | ACCUSSED STATEMENT u/s 313 CrPC |
Interim Orders
The witness (Nitin, 32-year-old driver) testified that he did not know the contents of the document he signed and that police did not recover any materials in his presence under the seizure memo (NIP-17). The court allowed the prosecution to treat the witness as hostile and permitted cross-examination by the defense counsel. The case (CC No. 89/2020) was adjourned with the next witness examination scheduled for 06-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The witness (Nitin, 32-year-old driver) testified that he did not know the contents of the document he signed and that police did not recover any materials in his presence under the seizure memo (NIP-17). The court allowed the prosecution to treat the witness as hostile and permitted cross-examination by the defense counsel. The case (CC No. 89/2020) was adjourned with the next witness examination scheduled for 06-12-2025. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts