THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs Satish Gajanana Naik, Ro-Humbahitlakeri, Jalavalakarki,Tq-Honavar — 31/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 126(2),115(2),118(2),352,R/w3(5). Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK610002302025
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
e-Filing Number
29-05-2025
Filing Number
31/2025
Filing Date
29-05-2025
Registration No
31/2025
Registration Date
29-05-2025
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR
Judge
526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Satish Gajanana Naik, Ro-Humbahitlakeri, Jalavalakarki,Tq-Honavar
Suneel Gajanana Naik
Adv. null
Uday Madev Naik
Adv. null
Seetaram Hanumanth Naik
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In this criminal case (CC 31/2025) from the Senior Civil Judge and First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Honnavur, a witness (Manjunath Gaud) was examined on 06-03-2026 regarding an alleged assault incident. The witness testified that he did not directly witness the accused attacking the victim on 28-10-2024, contradicting the prosecution's narrative, and the court treated him as an adverse witness permitting cross-examination. The court recorded the witness statement and case proceedings continued without any final order being pronounced on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In this criminal case (CC 31/2025) from the Senior Civil Judge and First Class Judicial Magistrate Court, Honnavur, a witness (Manjunath Gaud) was examined on 06-03-2026 regarding an alleged assault incident. The witness testified that he did not directly witness the accused attacking the victim on 28-10-2024, contradicting the prosecution's narrative, and the court treated him as an adverse witness permitting cross-examination. The court recorded the witness statement and case proceedings continued without any final order being pronounced on this date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts