THE STATE OF KARNATAKA vs FRANCIS SINJAV MIRANDA, AGE 31 YEARS, R/O NEAR KEB, NAGARABASTIKERI, HONNAVAR — 6/2026

Case under Karnataka Excise Act Section 15(A),32(3). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY/PLEA BARGAINING on 06th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK610000202026

e-Filing Number

22-01-2026

Filing Number

6/2026

Filing Date

22-Jan-2026

Registration No

6/2026

Registration Date

22-Jan-2026

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

526-Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

Decision Date

06-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY/PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Karnataka Excise Act Section 15(A),32(3)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FRANCIS SINJAV MIRANDA, AGE 31 YEARS, R/O NEAR KEB, NAGARABASTIKERI, HONNAVAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary In CC No. 6/2026, the accused pleaded guilty to offences under Section 15(A) and 32(3) of the Karnataka Excise Act. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000, with an alternative of 7 days simple imprisonment in default. Additionally, certain seized properties were ordered destroyed as worthless, while other properties were directed to be sent to excise police for legal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 06-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Senior CIVIL Judge and JMFC Honavara

  4. 22-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 6/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In CC No. 6/2026, the accused pleaded guilty to offences under Section 15(A) and 32(3) of the Karnataka Excise Act. The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 3,000, with an alternative of 7 days simple imprisonment in default. Additionally, certain seized properties were ordered destroyed as worthless, while other properties were directed to be sent to excise police for legal disposal. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case