Seetaram Venkta Haller vs Sandeep S/o. Narayan Naik — 2/2025

Case under U/sec 26 Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 166. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED IN PART on 25th March 2026.

M.V.C. - ACCIDENT CLAIM CASES U/R MOTOR

CNR: KAUK610000132025

Case disposed

Filing Number

2/2025

Filing Date

07-01-2025

Registration No

2/2025

Registration Date

07-01-2025

Court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR

Judge

526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA

Decision Date

25th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED IN PART

Acts & Sections

U/sec 26 Order 7 Rule 1 of Cpc Section 166

Petitioner(s)

Seetaram Venkta Haller

Adv. L.R. Naik

Respondent(s)

Sandeep S/o. Narayan Naik

Manager, Shriram General Insurance Co. Ltd., Bangaluru

Hearing History

Judge: 526-SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE and JMFC HONAVARA

25-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

13-03-2026

JUDGMENTS

26-02-2026

JUDGMENTS

23-02-2026

JUDGMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

25-03-2026
Judgment

Case Summary: Seetaram Venkta Haller v. Sandeep & Shriram General Insurance (MVC 2/2025) The court awarded Rs. 1,19,500 in compensation to the petitioner for grievous injuries sustained in a road accident caused by rash and negligent driving of a tempo. The court found the driver liable based on police records (FIR, charge sheet) and medical evidence showing a right volar barton fracture, and rejected the insurer's defense that policy violations absolved it of liability, as no evidence supported this contention. Both the vehicle owner and insurer were held jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation with 6% annual interest within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

25-03-2026

Decree

Interim Orders

04-09-2025
Orders
13-01-2026
Deposition
06-01-2026
Issue
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Seetaram Venkta Haller v. Sandeep & Shriram General Insurance (MVC 2/2025) The court awarded Rs. 1,19,500 in compensation to the petitioner for grievous injuries sustained in a road accident caused by rash and negligent driving of a tempo. The court found the driver liable based on police records (FIR, charge sheet) and medical evidence showing a right volar barton fracture, and rejected the insurer's defense that policy violations absolved it of liability, as no evidence supported this contention. Both the vehicle owner and insurer were held jointly and severally liable to pay the compensation with 6% annual interest within 60 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HONAVAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case