Suja W/o. Thamas Mathew, Age. 56 years. vs Saju W.o. Andrew Gracious, Age. 55 years. — 7/2018
Case under U/o. Xx Rule 8 of Cpc. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAUK520009462018
Next Hearing
11th June 2026
Filing Number
7/2018
Filing Date
29-10-2018
Registration No
7/2018
Registration Date
29-10-2018
Court
SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
1230-SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suja W/o. Thamas Mathew, Age. 56 years.
Adv. R.K.Kagadagar. Advocate, Gadag
Respondent(s)
Saju W.o. Andrew Gracious, Age. 55 years.
Suma Oommen Age. 54 years.
Soma Francies Andrade, Age. 53 years. r
Jaiji Oommen S/o V.A. Oommen Age. 48 years.
Hearing History
Judge: 1230-SNR. CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
ORDERS
For steps
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 30-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 16-12-2025 | ORDERS |
| 04-11-2025 | ORDERS |
| 14-10-2025 | For steps |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: FDP No. 7/2018 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court accepted the commissioner's report and directed a final decree to be drawn as per the partition division. Key Details: Petitioner Suja sought enforcement of a 1/5th share in suit properties following a partial decree from Original Suit No. 41/2017 (21-08-2018). After respondents failed to voluntarily divide the property, the court appointed the City Surveyor Dandeli as commissioner. Both consenting respondents and the commissioner's work were accepted without objection. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FDP No. 7/2018 Outcome: Petition ALLOWED. The court accepted the commissioner's report and directed a final decree to be drawn as per the partition division. Key Details: Petitioner Suja sought enforcement of a 1/5th share in suit properties following a partial decree from Original Suit No. 41/2017 (21-08-2018). After respondents failed to voluntarily divide the property, the court appointed the City Surveyor Dandeli as commissioner. Both consenting respondents and the commissioner's work were accepted without objection. Each party bears their own costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts