SHANKAR S/O MASANU TAMBURKAR, AGE. 62 YRS, R/O B K HALLI HALIYAL TQ vs SURESH S/O MAHADEV DAIVAJNYA YANE SONAR, AGE 54 YRS, R/O B.K. HALLI, HALIYAL TQ — 112/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1and2. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 26th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK510021872021

Case disposed

Filing Number

112/2021

Filing Date

24-11-2021

Registration No

112/2021

Registration Date

24-11-2021

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL

Judge

525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL

Decision Date

26th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O7,R1and2

Petitioner(s)

SHANKAR S/O MASANU TAMBURKAR, AGE. 62 YRS, R/O B K HALLI HALIYAL TQ

Adv. MARUTI NAGENDRA JUNJAWADKHAR

Respondent(s)

SURESH S/O MAHADEV DAIVAJNYA YANE SONAR, AGE 54 YRS, R/O B.K. HALLI, HALIYAL TQ

Hearing History

Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL

26-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

09-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

05-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

26-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

26-03-2026
Judgment
26-03-2026
Decree

Case Summary: O.S. No. 112/2021 Decision: The Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction with cost. The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant from obstructing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land (Survey No. 168/2) in B.K. Halli village, but the court found the claim insufficient and rejected the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Interim Orders

14-02-2023
Deposition
14-02-2023
Deposition
06-04-2023
Issue
12-01-2024
Deposition
27-07-2024
Deposition
25-09-2024
Deposition
16-01-2025
Deposition
22-08-2025
Deposition
06-02-2026
Orders
casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 112/2021 Decision: The Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal dismissed the plaintiff's suit for permanent injunction with cost. The plaintiff sought to restrain the defendant from obstructing his peaceful possession and enjoyment of agricultural land (Survey No. 168/2) in B.K. Halli village, but the court found the claim insufficient and rejected the relief sought. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case