THE STATE BY THE P.S.I. OF HALIYAL P.S. vs Duragappa S/o Maruti Helavar, Age. 23 Yrs, Occ. Cooli, R/o Hosahadagali, Tq Haliyal, Dist. UK — 1536/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379, 201, 411. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 28th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK510018872022
Next Hearing
28th March 2026
Filing Number
1536/2022
Filing Date
06-12-2022
Registration No
1536/2022
Registration Date
06-12-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE BY THE P.S.I. OF HALIYAL P.S.
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
Duragappa S/o Maruti Helavar, Age. 23 Yrs, Occ. Cooli, R/o Hosahadagali, Tq Haliyal, Dist. UK
Sameerulla @ Sameer Sohelahammad, Age. 22 Yrs, Occ. Cooli, R/o Chowhan Plot Haliyal, Tq Haliyal, UK
Juberkhan S/o Alamkhan Pathan, Age. 25 Yrs, Occ. Driver, R/o Old Hubballi, Tq Hubballi, Dharwad
Kishan S/o Anuraj Gondali, Age. 29 Yrs, Occ. Driver, R/o Chowhan Plot Haliyal Shahar ,Tq Haliyal,UK
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 21-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 07-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court order is in Kannada and concerns Criminal Case (CC) 1536/2022. The witness testimony was recorded on 07-02-2026 under oath, and during cross-examination, the witness's statements were marked as exhibits (Nipi 6, 7, and 8) regarding inconsistencies in police statements dated 14-11-2021 and 28-07-2022. The court found the witness's testimony regarding lack of prior knowledge about the case and non-cooperation with police to be credible, and noted that the accused's counsel indicated no cross-examination would be conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court order is in Kannada and concerns Criminal Case (CC) 1536/2022. The witness testimony was recorded on 07-02-2026 under oath, and during cross-examination, the witness's statements were marked as exhibits (Nipi 6, 7, and 8) regarding inconsistencies in police statements dated 14-11-2021 and 28-07-2022. The court found the witness's testimony regarding lack of prior knowledge about the case and non-cooperation with police to be credible, and noted that the accused's counsel indicated no cross-examination would be conducted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts