THE STATE REPT BY THE P.S.I OF HALIYAL P.S. vs Nagendra S/o Laxman Shimangouda,Age. 49 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Kalaginkoppa, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K. — 1349/2022
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 143,147,323,354,447,504,506R/W149. Status: APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK510016752022
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
1349/2022
Filing Date
20-10-2022
Registration No
1349/2022
Registration Date
20-10-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE REPT BY THE P.S.I OF HALIYAL P.S.
Respondent(s)
Nagendra S/o Laxman Shimangouda,Age. 49 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Kalaginkoppa, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.
Kedari S/o Fakeer Janagekar, Age. 52 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Kalaginkoppa, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.
Manjunath S/o Kedari Janakekar, Age. 26 Yrs, Occ. Cooli, R/o Kalaginkoppa., Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.
Basavanth S/o Ramu Pawar, Age. 55 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Kalaginkoppa, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.
Kiran S/o Namdev Pawar, Age. 23 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Kalaginkoppa, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.
Fishanna S/o Ningappa Doddagoud, Age. 26 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Kalaginkoppa, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.
Fishanna S/o Yallari Hucchati, Age. 26 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Kalaginkoppa, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 10-02-2026 | APPEARANCE OF ACCUSSED |
| 13-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 03-11-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary This is a criminal case (CC 1349/2022) involving allegations of assault. The court examined the testimony of the complainant (a 65-year-old woman) who alleged that two accused persons assaulted her and her mother two years ago without justification. The court found the complainant's evidence credible and the accused's defense unconvincing, noting inconsistencies in their testimony and that witnesses were mostly related to the accused. The court upheld the charges against the accused and proceeded with the case, rejecting their claims that no incident occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (CC 1349/2022) involving allegations of assault. The court examined the testimony of the complainant (a 65-year-old woman) who alleged that two accused persons assaulted her and her mother two years ago without justification. The court found the complainant's evidence credible and the accused's defense unconvincing, noting inconsistencies in their testimony and that witnesses were mostly related to the accused. The court upheld the charges against the accused and proceeded with the case, rejecting their claims that no incident occurred. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts