Mahadev Jayappa Ambolli, Age. 65 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Tergaon, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K. vs Manjunath Arjun Haibatti, Age. 42 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Tergaon, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K. — 111/2022

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 18-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK510016422022

Filing Number

111/2022

Filing Date

16-Sep-2022

Registration No

111/2022

Registration Date

16-Sep-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL

Judge

525-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Mahadev Jayappa Ambolli, Age. 65 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Tergaon, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.

    Adv. YALLARI NARAYAN ARASHINGERI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Manjunath Arjun Haibatti, Age. 42 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Tergaon, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.

  2. 2.Ravi Arjun Haibatti, Age. 40 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Yarikoppa, Tq and Dist. Dharwad

  3. 3.Praveen Arjun Haibatti, Age. 36 Yrs, Farmer, R/o Yarikoppa, Tq and Dist. Dharwad

  4. 4.Jayari Hanumanth Nimbalkar, Age. 38 Yrs, Occ. Housewife, R/o Navalur, Tq and Dist. Dharwad

  5. 5.Sahadev Ramappa Haibatti, Age. 58 Yrs, Occ. Farmer, R/o Tergaon, Tq Haliyal, Dist. U.K.

Case History

  1. 18-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  3. 21-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  4. 18-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  7. 20-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Case Summary: O.S. 111/2022 On 20-02-2026, Petitioner Mahadev Jayappa Ambolli's witness (PW 1) was cross-examined by the respondents' counsel regarding a property dispute. The witness testified about a boundary wall on the disputed property (Plot 149) and a newly constructed house, claiming the respondents built the structure on the petitioner's land and subsequently attempted to sell it. The cross-examination explored conflicting accounts regarding property ownership and the respondents' alleged fraudulent actions in filing a false claim to appropriate the petitioner's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 20-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  9. 05-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  10. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  11. 02-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  12. 14-Nov-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  13. 25-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  14. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  15. 29-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  16. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  17. 25-Jul-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  18. 21-Jun-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  19. 07-Mar-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  20. 12-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  21. 07-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  22. 04-Jan-2025

    IssueView PDF

  23. 04-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  24. 13-Dec-2024

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  25. 21-Nov-2024

    Amount Balance

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  26. 18-Oct-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  27. 30-Sep-2024

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  28. 27-Sep-2024

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  29. 20-Sep-2024

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  30. 09-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  31. 06-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  32. 09-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  33. 18-Jul-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  34. 18-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  35. 02-Jul-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  36. 24-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  37. 01-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  38. 06-Feb-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  39. 16-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  40. 15-Jan-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  41. 08-Dec-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  42. 04-Nov-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  43. 22-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  44. 22-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  45. 12-Jul-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  46. 15-Jun-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  47. 19-Apr-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  48. 01-Apr-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  49. 03-Mar-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  50. 06-Feb-2023

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  51. 15-Dec-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  52. 19-Sep-2022

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  53. 17-Sep-2022

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  54. 16-Sep-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  55. 16-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. 111/2022 On 20-02-2026, Petitioner Mahadev Jayappa Ambolli's witness (PW 1) was cross-examined by the respondents' counsel regarding a property dispute. The witness testified about a boundary wall on the disputed property (Plot 149) and a newly constructed house, claiming the respondents built the structure on the petitioner's land and subsequently attempted to sell it. The cross-examination explored conflicting accounts regarding property ownership and the respondents' alleged fraudulent actions in filing a false claim to appropriate the petitioner's property. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case