Shri. Bhavakayee Devi Devastan Trust Committee, vs Yallari Masanu Kadam — 93/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7R.1,2. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 25th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK510015742022
Next Hearing
25th June 2026
Filing Number
93/2022
Filing Date
28-07-2022
Registration No
93/2022
Registration Date
28-07-2022
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Bhavakayee Devi Devastan Trust Committee,
Adv. M B Pujar
Maruti Somaning Kolekar
Balakrishna Naago Ghaadi,
Mahesh Rukkanna Gardoolkar,
Holeppa Shantaram Palekar,
Nagendra Channappa Nimbalakar,
Shivaji Gundu Patil,
Raghunatha Masanu Bhosle,
Krishna Rama Charadkar,
Ganapati Mahadev Hatelkar,
Govinda Parashurama Dhumaali,
Respondent(s)
Yallari Masanu Kadam
Mahesh S/o. Yallari Kadam,
Dileep Krishnaji DEshpande,
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 26-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 26-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary of Case 93/2022 Court: Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal, Uttara Kannada Decided: 4 December 2025 Outcome: The court rejected an application (I.A No.VII) filed by 20 proposed defendants seeking to be impleaded as defendants 4-23 in the suit. The judge found the proposed defendants had no right, title, or interest in the disputed temple property and were not necessary or proper parties to the proceedings, as the dispute concerned only the Bhavakayee Devi Devastan Trust Committee and the original defendants over a 1-acre agricultural property allegedly gifted to the temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 93/2022 Court: Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal, Uttara Kannada Decided: 4 December 2025 Outcome: The court rejected an application (I.A No.VII) filed by 20 proposed defendants seeking to be impleaded as defendants 4-23 in the suit. The judge found the proposed defendants had no right, title, or interest in the disputed temple property and were not necessary or proper parties to the proceedings, as the dispute concerned only the Bhavakayee Devi Devastan Trust Committee and the original defendants over a 1-acre agricultural property allegedly gifted to the temple. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts