Smt. Parwati W/o. Mohan Patil alias Gouda, 48y, agriculture, vs Shri. Gundu S/o. Naayan Petnekar, 37y, agriculture, — 95/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R.1. Status: Issues. Next hearing: 11th June 2026.

Issues Next hearing 11-Jun-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK510010052025

Filing Number

93/2025

Filing Date

03-Sep-2025

Registration No

95/2025

Registration Date

03-Sep-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL

Judge

525-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Smt. Parwati W/o. Mohan Patil alias Gouda, 48y, agriculture,

    Adv. CHANDRASHEKAR VEERABHANDRA NUCHAMBLI

  2. 2.Sri. Kuber, S/o. Mohan Patil alias Gouda, 26y, agriculture,

  3. 3.Sri. Pawan S/o.Mohan Patil alias Gouda, 24y, agriculture,

  4. 4.umari Pavitra D/o. Mohan Patil alias Gouda, 22y, agriculture,

  5. 5.Smt. Ausha W/o. Suresh Patil alias Gouda, 46y, agriculture,

  6. 6.Smt. Kalawati W/o. Kuber Nesrekar, 29y, agriculture,

  7. 7.Nagaraj S/o. Suresh Patil alias Gouda, 27y, agriculture,

  8. 8.Smt. Pooja alias Laxmi W/o.Aravind Shirodkar, 26y, agriculture,

  9. 9.Sri. Prakash S/o. Krishna Patil alias Gouda, 55y, agriculture,

  10. 10.Smt. Rukmini W/o. Tukaram Patil alias Gouda, 40y, agriculture,

  11. 11.Kumari Komal D/o. Tukaram Patil alias Gouda, 22y, agriculture,

  12. 12.Balakrishna S/o.Tukaram Patil alias Gouda, 21y, agriculture,

  13. 13.Shridhar S/o.Tukaram Patil alias Gouda, 20y, agriculture,

  14. 14.Shri. Maruti Krishna Patil alias Gouda, 47y, agriculture,

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shri. Gundu S/o. Naayan Petnekar, 37y, agriculture,

  2. 2.Smt. Premalatha W/o. Purushottam Teli, 70y, household,

  3. 3.Shri. Satish S/o. Purushottam Teli, 53y, coolie,

  4. 4.Shri. Vaman S/o. Purushottam Teli, 60y, coolie,

  5. 5.Shri. Nagesh S/o. Purushottam Teli, 58y, Govt. Servant,

  6. 6.Smt.Suhashini W/o. Prakash Hanbar, 56y, household,

  7. 7.Shri. Shankar S/o. Purushottam Teli, 54y, Pvt. Service,

Case History

  1. 11-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-Jun-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  4. 21-Apr-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  5. 01-Apr-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  6. 13-Mar-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  7. 21-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  8. 04-Feb-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  9. 30-Jan-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  10. 14-Jan-2026

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  12. 28-Nov-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  13. 13-Nov-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  14. 10-Oct-2025

    Summons

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  15. 06-Sep-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    Case Summary: OS No. 95/2025 Outcome: Ex-parte ad-interim temporary injunction GRANTED. Defendants 2-7 are restrained from alienating or creating charges over suit property Item No.1 (agricultural land in Gudnapur Village, Haliyal Taluk) until the next hearing. Plaintiffs must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3(a), and suit summons are to be issued to defendants after such compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  16. 06-Sep-2025

    Appearance Of Party

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  17. 04-Sep-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  18. 03-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  19. 03-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 95/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS No. 95/2025 Outcome: Ex-parte ad-interim temporary injunction GRANTED. Defendants 2-7 are restrained from alienating or creating charges over suit property Item No.1 (agricultural land in Gudnapur Village, Haliyal Taluk) until the next hearing. Plaintiffs must comply with CPC Order 39 Rule 3(a), and suit summons are to be issued to defendants after such compliance. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case