Kumar Neelkanth S/o. Balappa Jadhav, 28y, Pvt. work, Ammanakoppa, Haliyal, U.K. vs Deputy Director, Department of Public Education, Sirsi Educational District,Sirsi — 79/2025
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R.1. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK510009492025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
77/2025
Filing Date
12-08-2025
Registration No
79/2025
Registration Date
13-08-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Kumar Neelkanth S/o. Balappa Jadhav, 28y, Pvt. work, Ammanakoppa, Haliyal, U.K.
Adv. MEGHARAJ R. METRI.
Respondent(s)
Deputy Director, Department of Public Education, Sirsi Educational District,Sirsi
BEO, Haliyal.
Head Master, Govt. Hr.Primary School, Ammanakoppa, Haliyal.
Head Master, Carmel High School, Haliyal.
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
ORDERS
ORDERS
OBJECTION
HEARING
JUDGMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 06-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 02-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 28-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 21-02-2026 | JUDGMENTS |
Interim Orders
On 23-01-2026, the witness was sworn in and subjected to cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness testified regarding name corrections in school transfer documents and provided evidence about family genealogy, specifically addressing claims about grandfather relationships and lineage documentation. The court granted time to the defendant's counsel to continue cross-examination, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
On 23-01-2026, the witness was sworn in and subjected to cross-examination by the defendant's counsel. The witness testified regarding name corrections in school transfer documents and provided evidence about family genealogy, specifically addressing claims about grandfather relationships and lineage documentation. The court granted time to the defendant's counsel to continue cross-examination, and the matter was adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts