Sri. Nanda S/o.Babuni Savant, 54y, agriculture, R/o. Satnalli, Haliyal, U.K. vs Sri. Tukaram S/o. Babuni Savant, 65y, agriculture, R/o. Satnalli, Haliyal,U.K — 94/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7R.1,2. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK510007912023
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
Filing Number
94/2023
Filing Date
26-08-2023
Registration No
94/2023
Registration Date
26-08-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Nanda S/o.Babuni Savant, 54y, agriculture, R/o. Satnalli, Haliyal, U.K.
Adv. RENUKA MARUTI CHOUGALE
Respondent(s)
Sri. Tukaram S/o. Babuni Savant, 65y, agriculture, R/o. Satnalli, Haliyal,U.K
Sri. Appaji S/o. Tukaram Hattikar, 45y, agriculture, R/o. Satnalli, Haliyal, U.K.
Sri. Dasharath S/o. Tukaram Hattikar, 40y, agriculture, R/o.Satnalli , Haliyal, U.K.
Sri. Ramchandra S/o. Tukaram Hattikar, 35y, agriculture, R/o. Satnalli village, Haliyal.
Jeejabai S/o. Tukaram Hattikar, 38y, household, R/o. Satnalli, Haliyal, U.K.
Leelabai S/o. Tukaram Hattikar, 30y, household, R/o. Satnalli , Haliyal.
Smt. Renuka Kom. Balundri Mirashi, 58y, household, R/o. Muttalmuri, Haliyal, U.K.
Smt. Shaku Kom. Maruti Matolakar, 56y, household, R/o. Nagaragali, Khanapur, Belgavi.
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
Amendment of Plaint
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 05-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 15-12-2025 | Amendment of Plaint |
Interim Orders
Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal allowed the application filed by defendants 1-7 to transpose themselves as plaintiffs 1-7 in Original Suit No. 94/2023 (a partition suit). The original plaintiff's withdrawal memo was rejected procedurally, permitting the defendants—who have equal shares in the disputed property—to continue the partition suit as new plaintiffs against the original plaintiff (now defendant 1) and defendant 8 (now defendant 2). The defendants were directed to file an amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal allowed the application filed by defendants 1-7 to transpose themselves as plaintiffs 1-7 in Original Suit No. 94/2023 (a partition suit). The original plaintiff's withdrawal memo was rejected procedurally, permitting the defendants—who have equal shares in the disputed property—to continue the partition suit as new plaintiffs against the original plaintiff (now defendant 1) and defendant 8 (now defendant 2). The defendants were directed to file an amended plaint. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts