Suresh Krishna Shirodkar,, Age. 55 years, R.o. Bidrolli village, Tq. Haliyal vs Parvati W.o Shankar Shirodkar, Age.45 years, R.o. Bidrolli village, Tq. Haliyal and others. — 13/2019
Case under Order 39 Rule 2a Cpc Section 39. Status: OBJECTION. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
Misc - Miscellaneous Cases
CNR: KAUK510007352019
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
Filing Number
13/2019
Filing Date
28-08-2019
Registration No
13/2019
Registration Date
28-08-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Suresh Krishna Shirodkar,, Age. 55 years, R.o. Bidrolli village, Tq. Haliyal
Adv. B .N. Ramesh
Respondent(s)
Parvati W.o Shankar Shirodkar, Age.45 years, R.o. Bidrolli village, Tq. Haliyal and others.
Shankar Hanumanth Shirodkar, 50y, Agriculture, R/o. Bidrolli, Haliyal.
Dayanand Shankar Shirodkar, 24y, agriculture, R/o. Bidrolli, Haliyal, U.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
OBJECTION
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 17-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 06-03-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 19-02-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 07-02-2026 | HEARING |
| 24-01-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
In Civil Misc No. 13/2019, the cross-examination of PW-1 (Plaintiff's Witness-1) was conducted on 19-07-2024 with the testimony translated from Marathi to Kannada. The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving construction of a wall and claims for compensation of Rs. 30,000, of which Rs. 10,000 was allegedly paid by the defendant. The court case was adjourned after recording the witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with no substantive order granting or dismissing relief at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In Civil Misc No. 13/2019, the cross-examination of PW-1 (Plaintiff's Witness-1) was conducted on 19-07-2024 with the testimony translated from Marathi to Kannada. The witness testified regarding a property dispute involving construction of a wall and claims for compensation of Rs. 30,000, of which Rs. 10,000 was allegedly paid by the defendant. The court case was adjourned after recording the witness's examination-in-chief and cross-examination, with no substantive order granting or dismissing relief at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts