Shri. Hanamanth S/o. Apparao Mirashi, 67y, agriculture, R./o. Magawad, Haliyal, U.K. vs Smt. Laxmi W/o. Suresh Chapolkar, 65y, household, R/o. Tergaon, Haliyal, U.K. — 77/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.VIIR.1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 17th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK510005612023
Next Hearing
17th April 2026
Filing Number
77/2023
Filing Date
28-06-2023
Registration No
77/2023
Registration Date
28-06-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shri. Hanamanth S/o. Apparao Mirashi, 67y, agriculture, R./o. Magawad, Haliyal, U.K.
Adv. CHANDRASHEKAR VEERABHANDRA NUCHAMBLI
Shri. Devendra S/o. Apparao Mirashi, 58y, agriculture, R/o. Magawad, Tq. Haliyal, U.K.
Smt. Yallavva alias Shobha W/o. Yallappa Savant, 52y, household, R/o. Mugalihal, Tq. Khanapur,
Smt. Susheela W/o. Narayan Honagekar, 68y, household, R/o. Tergaon, Tq.Haliyal, U.K.
Respondent(s)
Smt. Laxmi W/o. Suresh Chapolkar, 65y, household, R/o. Tergaon, Haliyal, U.K.
Shri. Tukuram S/o. Suresh Chapolkar, 50y, agriculture, R/o. Tergaon, Tq. Haliyal, U.K.
Shri. Manjunath S/o. Suresh Chapolkar, 45y, agriculture, R/o. Tergaon, Tq. Haliyal, U.K.
Smt. Bharati W/o,. Ningappa Chapolkar, 40y, household, R/o. Tergaon, Tq. Haliyal, U.K.
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
EVIDENCE
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
SUMMONS
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 13-02-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 22-01-2026 | SUMMONS |
| 03-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary In O.S. No. 77/2023, the court conducted the main hearing on 23-10-2025 where the plaintiff's witness (PW-2) was examined and cross-examined. The plaintiff's claim has been allowed/decreed based on the testimony and evidence presented. The defendant's counsel was given time to respond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In O.S. No. 77/2023, the court conducted the main hearing on 23-10-2025 where the plaintiff's witness (PW-2) was examined and cross-examined. The plaintiff's claim has been allowed/decreed based on the testimony and evidence presented. The defendant's counsel was given time to respond. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts