Lalu S/o. Shankar Lamani, 52years, Agriculture, vs Chandrashekar S/o. Rudrappa Mathad, 65year, Agriculture, — 42/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R.1. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Evidence Next hearing 23-Apr-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK510004662025

Filing Number

40/2025

Filing Date

26-Mar-2025

Registration No

42/2025

Registration Date

26-Mar-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL

Judge

525-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section O.7R.1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Lalu S/o. Shankar Lamani, 52years, Agriculture,

    Adv. A C Chakalabbi

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Chandrashekar S/o. Rudrappa Mathad, 65year, Agriculture,

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  3. 16-Feb-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  4. 24-Jan-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  5. 19-Jan-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  6. 08-Jan-2026

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  7. 27-Nov-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  8. 07-Nov-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  9. 16-Oct-2025

    OrdersView PDF

    SUMMARY: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the disputed agricultural land (R.S. No.141/Block No.141, measuring 2 acres 20 guntas) until the suit is disposed. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with balance of convenience and irreparable injury favoring him, as he was in actual possession of the land despite it being granted to the defendant in 1979, and noted that a full trial was necessary to clarify the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  10. 16-Oct-2025

    Issues

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  11. 13-Oct-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  12. 27-Sep-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  13. 19-Sep-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  14. 21-Aug-2025

    Orders

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  15. 13-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  16. 07-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  17. 02-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  18. 23-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  19. 14-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  20. 09-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  21. 26-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  22. 17-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  23. 16-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  24. 25-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  25. 08-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  26. 03-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  27. 28-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal

  28. 26-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  29. 26-Mar-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 42/2025

casestatus.in Summary

SUMMARY: The court granted a temporary injunction in favor of the plaintiff, restraining the defendant from obstructing the plaintiff's peaceful possession and enjoyment of the disputed agricultural land (R.S. No.141/Block No.141, measuring 2 acres 20 guntas) until the suit is disposed. The court found that the plaintiff had established a prima facie case with balance of convenience and irreparable injury favoring him, as he was in actual possession of the land despite it being granted to the defendant in 1979, and noted that a full trial was necessary to clarify the property dispute. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case