Ibrahim S.o. Abdul Raheeman Tigadolli, 60 yrs, Agriculturist, Manakapur Grama, Tq.Dist.Dharwad. vs Sri. Abdul Sattar Imam Tigadolli, — 59/2017
Case under Order Vii Rule 1 and 2 R-w 26 of Cpc. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 09th April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK510004652017
Next Hearing
09th April 2026
Filing Number
59/2017
Filing Date
28-04-2017
Registration No
59/2017
Registration Date
28-04-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ibrahim S.o. Abdul Raheeman Tigadolli, 60 yrs, Agriculturist, Manakapur Grama, Tq.Dist.Dharwad.
Adv. CHANDRASHEKAR VEERABHANDRA NUCHAMBLI
Shri. Akalakahmed S.o. Abdul Raheeman Tigadolli, 46 yrs, Agriculturist, Tergaon village, Haliyal, U.
Respondent(s)
Sri. Abdul Sattar Imam Tigadolli,
Shri. Mahammedyasin, S.o. Abudlhameed Tigadolli, 48 yrs, Advocate, Halehubballi, Hubballi.(Legal Heir)
Shri. Abdulajeej S.o. Abdulhameed Tigadolli, 46 yrs, Agriculturst, Tergaon village, Haliyal, U.K.(Legal Heir)
Shri. Abdulkhadar , S.o. Imamsaheb Tigadolli,(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 19-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 05-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 22-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
In O.S. No. 59/2017, the court heard the main examination on 12-03-2026 where the plaintiff's counsel (J.C.M.) represented the plaintiff. The plaintiff (2nd defendant in the case) submitted an affidavit affirming that all statements therein are true and correct. The court allowed the plaintiff's claim (decreed the suit) in their favor. The defendant's counsel requested time, which was granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In O.S. No. 59/2017, the court heard the main examination on 12-03-2026 where the plaintiff's counsel (J.C.M.) represented the plaintiff. The plaintiff (2nd defendant in the case) submitted an affidavit affirming that all statements therein are true and correct. The court allowed the plaintiff's claim (decreed the suit) in their favor. The defendant's counsel requested time, which was granted by the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts