Irshadahmad Mahmadagous Tametagar vs Birth and death officer Tahasildar Haliyal uk — 110/2026
Case under Registration of Births and Deaths Act Section 13-3. Disposed: Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH on 14th March 2026.
Crl.Misc. - CRIMINAL MISC.CASES
CNR: KAUK510003822026
e-Filing Number
12-03-2026
Filing Number
110/2026
Filing Date
12-Mar-2026
Registration No
110/2026
Registration Date
13-Mar-2026
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--SETTLED IN LOK ADALATH
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
FIR Details
Police Station
HALIYAL PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Irshadahmad Mahmadagous Tametagar
Adv. ABDULRAHIMAN FHAKARUDDIN KITTUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.Birth and death officer Tahasildar Haliyal uk
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
OrdersView PDF
The Lok Adalath allowed the petition filed by Irshadahmad Mahmadagous Tametagar under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, after the respondent Birth and Death Officer agreed to record the petitioner's date of birth. The court directed the respondent to enter the petitioner's date of birth as 22.07.1963 in the birth register for Kurigadda village, Haliyal Taluk, Uttar Kannada, based on the voluntary settlement reached between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Haliyal
-
13-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 110/2026
The Lok Adalath allowed the petition filed by Irshadahmad Mahmadagous Tametagar under Section 13(3) of the Registration of Births and Deaths Act, 1969, after the respondent Birth and Death Officer agreed to record the petitioner's date of birth. The court directed the respondent to enter the petitioner's date of birth as 22.07.1963 in the birth register for Kurigadda village, Haliyal Taluk, Uttar Kannada, based on the voluntary settlement reached between parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts