Chandrakant S/o Yallappa Shiragapur, Age. 72 Yrs, Occ. Agrl. vs Kareemsha S/o Latisfsha Latifnavar, Age. 60 Yrs, Occ. Agrl. — 37/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 18th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK510003772023

EVIDENCE

Next Hearing

18th June 2026

Filing Number

37/2023

Filing Date

16-03-2023

Registration No

37/2023

Registration Date

16-03-2023

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL

Judge

525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7Rule1

Petitioner(s)

Chandrakant S/o Yallappa Shiragapur, Age. 72 Yrs, Occ. Agrl.

Adv. MEGHARAJ R. METRI.

Respondent(s)

Kareemsha S/o Latisfsha Latifnavar, Age. 60 Yrs, Occ. Agrl.

Hearing History

Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL

16-04-2026

EVIDENCE

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

26-02-2026

SUMMONS

12-02-2026

SUMMONS

23-01-2026

SUMMONS

Interim Orders

03-04-2024
Orders
01-06-2024
Issue
06-01-2026
Orders

Case Summary: O.S. No. 37/2023 Court: Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal, Uttara Kannada Decided: 6 January 2026 Parties: Chandrakant S/o Yallappa Shiragapur (Plaintiff) v. Kareemsha S/o Latifsha Latifnavar (Defendant) Outcome: The plaintiff's application (I.A. No. IV) to amend the plaint was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to delete references to "Declaration" from the plaint's cause title and prayer clause, narrowing the suit from seeking both declaration of ownership and permanent injunction to seeking only permanent injunction regarding encroachment on the suit property (Survey No. 54, Haliyal Village). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: O.S. No. 37/2023 Court: Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal, Uttara Kannada Decided: 6 January 2026 Parties: Chandrakant S/o Yallappa Shiragapur (Plaintiff) v. Kareemsha S/o Latifsha Latifnavar (Defendant) Outcome: The plaintiff's application (I.A. No. IV) to amend the plaint was allowed. The court permitted the plaintiff to delete references to "Declaration" from the plaint's cause title and prayer clause, narrowing the suit from seeking both declaration of ownership and permanent injunction to seeking only permanent injunction regarding encroachment on the suit property (Survey No. 54, Haliyal Village). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case