Smt. Basavennevva W/o Krishna Dandi,68y, agriculture, housewife,Chowki Math, Hosur Galli,Haliyal vs Shri. Parashuram S/o. Anant Kaktikar, 44y, business, R/o. Om Nagar, 1st cross, Kalyani Layout, — 33/2023
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/o.7R.1to3. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 12th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK510003662023
Next Hearing
12th June 2026
Filing Number
33/2023
Filing Date
13-03-2023
Registration No
33/2023
Registration Date
14-03-2023
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Basavennevva W/o Krishna Dandi,68y, agriculture, housewife,Chowki Math, Hosur Galli,Haliyal
Adv. SUPRITKUMAR KEMPANNA KALAJ
Respondent(s)
Shri. Parashuram S/o. Anant Kaktikar, 44y, business, R/o. Om Nagar, 1st cross, Kalyani Layout,
Shri. Sagar S/o. Anant Kaktikar,34y,business,Om Nagar,1st cross, Kalyani Layout,Kashabag Belagavi
Praveen S/o. Anant Kaktikar,30y,business,Om Nagar,1st cross, Kalyani layout,Kashabag,Belagavi.
The Tahashildar, Tahashildar and Executive Magistrate, Haliyal.
Abdulhameed S/o. Abdulmajid Maniyar, 53y, business, R/o. No. B 27, Jawahar Road, Haliyal, U.K.
Altaf S/o. Abdulmajid Maniyar, 465y, business, R/o. No.B 27, Jawahar Road, Haliyal.
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
EVIDENCE
OBJECTION
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 02-06-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-04-2026 | OBJECTION |
| 02-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 10-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: O.S. No. 33/2023 Outcome: The Court allowed the plaintiff's interim application (I.A. No. VIII) for temporary injunction. Defendants No. 5 and 6 are restrained from alienating the suit property until disposal of the case. No costs awarded. Key Facts: The 68-year-old plaintiff sold her Stridhan property to defendants No. 1 and 2 for ₹3,00,000 in July 2022. They later agreed to cancel the sale, but instead of returning the property, they gifted it to defendant No. 3 via gift deed. During the suit's pendency, defendant No. 3 sold the property to defendants No. 5 and 6 in July 2024. The court found prima facie grounds that restraining further alienation would prevent multiplicity of proceedings and serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: O.S. No. 33/2023 Outcome: The Court allowed the plaintiff's interim application (I.A. No. VIII) for temporary injunction. Defendants No. 5 and 6 are restrained from alienating the suit property until disposal of the case. No costs awarded. Key Facts: The 68-year-old plaintiff sold her Stridhan property to defendants No. 1 and 2 for ₹3,00,000 in July 2022. They later agreed to cancel the sale, but instead of returning the property, they gifted it to defendant No. 3 via gift deed. During the suit's pendency, defendant No. 3 sold the property to defendants No. 5 and 6 in July 2024. The court found prima facie grounds that restraining further alienation would prevent multiplicity of proceedings and serve justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts