Hanumanth Gangappa Javalkar, Deceased by his LRs.(Legal Heir) vs Kedari Gangappa javalikar, deceased by his LRs. Advocate - CHANDRASHEKAR VEERABHANDRA NUCHAMBLI — 2/2014
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U.ORD.20RULE12OFCPC. Status: ORDERS. Next hearing: 06th June 2026.
FDP - Petitioner For Final Decree pr
CNR: KAUK510001662014
Next Hearing
06th June 2026
Filing Number
2/2014
Filing Date
17-02-2014
Registration No
2/2014
Registration Date
17-02-2014
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Hanumanth Gangappa Javalkar, Deceased by his LRs.(Legal Heir)
Adv. PRAKASH BASAPPA ANGADI1.
Mahabaleshwar hanumanth Javalkar, Ro Haliyal
Adv. P.B. Angadi1.
Krishnaji Hanumanth Javalkar, A-48 ro Haliyal
Adv. P.B. Angadi1.
Shankar Hanumanth Javalkar, Age-44 ro Haliyal
Adv. P.B. Angadi1.
Shivaji Hanumanth Javalkar, Age-46 Ro Haliyal
Adv. P.B. Angadi1.
Shanta Wo Yallappa Hanchinamani, ro Haliyal
Adv. P.B. Angadi1.
Kantavva Rudrappa Pujari, Ro Haliyal
Adv. P.B. Angadi1.
Kalpana Wo Fakira Dongre, koodalagi village, Khal
Adv. P.B. Angadi
Respondent(s)
Kedari Gangappa javalikar, deceased by his LRs. Advocate - CHANDRASHEKAR VEERABHANDRA NUCHAMBLI
Somaning Gangappa Javalkar, deceased by his Lrs(Legal Heir)
Bhimray Gangappa javalkar deceased by his Lrs.(Legal Heir)
1. e.i.Shri.Bhimarao Shivaray Kumabarkoppa
1.e.ii.Smt.Indumati D/o Bhimrao KUmbarkoppa
1.e.iii.Smt.Kusuma Bhimarao Kumbarkoppa
1.e.iv.Smt Mangala Bhimarao Kumbarkoppa
1.e.v.Smt Shalini Bhimarao Kumbarkoppa
1.e.vi.Shri Malleshi Bhimarao Kumbarkoppa
1.e.vii.Shri Santosh Bhimarao Kumbarkoppa
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
ORDERS
ORDERS
HEARING
HEARING
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-06-2026 | ORDERS |
| 24-04-2026 | ORDERS |
| 17-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 01-04-2026 | HEARING |
| 13-03-2026 | HEARING |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: FDP No. 2/2014 Court: Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal, Uttara Kannada Decided: 22 August 2025 Order: Interim Application No. 20 (I.A. No. 20) REJECTED with costs of Rs. 5,000/- Key Facts: This was an application by certain respondents seeking permission to cross-examine the Court Commissioner regarding his report on property division (agricultural lands in multiple villages). The Court Commissioner's report had already been accepted by the court on 7 March 2024 after considering all prior objections filed by respondents. Reasoning: The court found that: (1) respondents raised identical contentions during the earlier objection stage which were already considered and rejected; (2) respondents deliberately delayed proceedings—the Commissioner submitted his report in 2015, yet objections were filed only in 2023; (3) once a court order accepting the Commissioner's report has been passed, the court cannot reverse its own judgment; and (4) the application appeared designed to deliberately protract proceedings and abuse the legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: FDP No. 2/2014 Court: Civil Judge & JMFC, Haliyal, Uttara Kannada Decided: 22 August 2025 Order: Interim Application No. 20 (I.A. No. 20) REJECTED with costs of Rs. 5,000/- Key Facts: This was an application by certain respondents seeking permission to cross-examine the Court Commissioner regarding his report on property division (agricultural lands in multiple villages). The Court Commissioner's report had already been accepted by the court on 7 March 2024 after considering all prior objections filed by respondents. Reasoning: The court found that: (1) respondents raised identical contentions during the earlier objection stage which were already considered and rejected; (2) respondents deliberately delayed proceedings—the Commissioner submitted his report in 2015, yet objections were filed only in 2023; (3) once a court order accepting the Commissioner's report has been passed, the court cannot reverse its own judgment; and (4) the application appeared designed to deliberately protract proceedings and abuse the legal process. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts