Sushila W/o Sahadev Rangoji, Age. 46 years, R.o. Shivapur Tq. Haliyal, U.K vs Kamalavva W.o Kalappa Matti, Age. 80 years, R.o. Shivapur village, Tq. Haliyal, U.K — 8/2019
Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 of C.p.c Section vii. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK510000702019
Next Hearing
26th March 2026
Filing Number
8/2019
Filing Date
23-01-2019
Registration No
8/2019
Registration Date
23-01-2019
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL
Judge
525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sushila W/o Sahadev Rangoji, Age. 46 years, R.o. Shivapur Tq. Haliyal, U.K
Adv. CHANDRASHEKAR VEERABHANDRA NUCHAMBLI
Gangavva W.o Jayavanth Dandi, Age. 42 years, R.o. B.K. Halli, Tq. Haliyal, U.K
Respondent(s)
Kamalavva W.o Kalappa Matti, Age. 80 years, R.o. Shivapur village, Tq. Haliyal, U.K
Mallavva @ Yallavva W.o Rajappa pawar, 50Years, R.o. Roaudihal village,Tq and Dist. Dharwad
Somavva W.o Basappa Aaryar @ Aarer, Age. 48 years, R.o. Gulankoppa village, Tq and Dist. Dharwad
Laxmi W.o Sahadev Aarer, Age. 44 years, R.o. Shivapur Tq. Haliyal, U.K
Jijabai W.o Basavaraj Hugadi, Age. 35 years, R.o. Thumarikoppa village, Tq. Kalagatagi Dist. Dharwad
Shekappa S.o Kedarappa Matti, Age. 50 years, R.o. Galagi Hulkoppa village, Kalaghatagi, Dharwad
Nagappa S.o Kedarappa Matti, Age. 60 years, R.o.Galagi Hulkoppa village, Tq. Kalghatagi Dist. Dharwd(Legal Heir)
Mahadev S/o Hanamant Matti, Age. 60 years, R.o.Galagi Hulkoppa village, Tq. Kalghatagi Dist. Dharwd
Sahadev S.o Hanamant Matti, Age. 56 years, R.o.Galagi Hulkoppa village, Tq. Kalghatagi Dist. Dharwd(Legal Heir)
Hearing History
Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 20-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 06-02-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 23-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary: In case O.S.8/2019 (Cross-examination of Defendant Witness 2), the court hearing was held on 06-03-2026. The witness was cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel regarding property disputes (survey numbers 140 and 150), family claims, and the health condition of the defendant's mother. The court found that the witness gave false and contradictory testimony, particularly regarding the defendant's mother's inability to appear in court due to illness and blindness, and regarding the plaintiffs' share in the disputed property. The testimony was deemed unreliable and inconsistent with earlier statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case O.S.8/2019 (Cross-examination of Defendant Witness 2), the court hearing was held on 06-03-2026. The witness was cross-examined by the plaintiff's counsel regarding property disputes (survey numbers 140 and 150), family claims, and the health condition of the defendant's mother. The court found that the witness gave false and contradictory testimony, particularly regarding the defendant's mother's inability to appear in court due to illness and blindness, and regarding the plaintiffs' share in the disputed property. The testimony was deemed unreliable and inconsistent with earlier statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts