Nagendra S.o Shankar Jivoji vs Hanamavva W.o Omanna Waddar — 5/2020

Case under U/o Vii Rule 1 of C.p.c Section 7. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK510000052020

ARGUMENTS

Next Hearing

25th March 2026

Filing Number

5/2020

Filing Date

04-01-2020

Registration No

5/2020

Registration Date

04-01-2020

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL

Judge

525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL

Acts & Sections

U/o Vii Rule 1 of C.p.c Section 7

Petitioner(s)

Nagendra S.o Shankar Jivoji

Adv. P. B. Angadi and A.P. Murari

Respondent(s)

Hanamavva W.o Omanna Waddar

Adiveppa S.o Mukharaya Waddar

Demavva W.o Shivappa Bhovi

Durgappa S.o Basappa Waddar

Hearing History

Judge: 525-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, HALIYAL

17-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

12-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-03-2026

ARGUMENTS

19-02-2026

ARGUMENTS

06-02-2026

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

05-04-2021
Issue
07-07-2023
Issue
31-08-2024
Orders
06-02-2025
Deposition
01-03-2025
Deposition
29-01-2026
Deposition
06-02-2026
Deposition

Summary: In O.S. 5/2020 (Further Cross of Witness 1), the court proceeded with cross-examination on 06-02-2026. The defendant's counsel argued that Hanumavva and Devi had no rights to property at Survey No. 18/8, and that they had relinquished their share, citing MR No. 7/2004-05. The court noted that the defendant produced no supporting documents for their counter-claim and has no right to dispute the plaintiff's property ownership. The matter references FDP 4/2012 and an earlier dispute filed at the Tahsildar's office; the court ordered that all rights and liabilities of the purchasers be determined in Original Suit No. 13/2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. 5/2020 (Further Cross of Witness 1), the court proceeded with cross-examination on 06-02-2026. The defendant's counsel argued that Hanumavva and Devi had no rights to property at Survey No. 18/8, and that they had relinquished their share, citing MR No. 7/2004-05. The court noted that the defendant produced no supporting documents for their counter-claim and has no right to dispute the plaintiff's property ownership. The matter references FDP 4/2012 and an earlier dispute filed at the Tahsildar's office; the court ordered that all rights and liabilities of the purchasers be determined in Original Suit No. 13/2021. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, HALIYAL All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case