Smt. Mary w/o Late Apollo Nandiyala Dead.By Lrs(Legal Heir) vs Shri Cleopas s/o Rajamni Malla,Occupation WCPM employee. — 293/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section U/oVIIR1. Status: ARGUMENTS. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK410017452024
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
Filing Number
293/2024
Filing Date
09-12-2024
Registration No
293/2024
Registration Date
09-12-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt. Mary w/o Late Apollo Nandiyala Dead.By Lrs(Legal Heir)
Adv. PEERSAB SAYYED NADAF1.
Prakashan s/o Late Apollo Nandiyala, age 52 years,Occupation Privtae service. 1.
Sri Solomon Raju s/o Late Appolios Namdiyal, age 48 years Occupation Private Service. 1.
Sri Ephrem s/o Late Appollo Nandiyala,age 46 yrs,Occupation Private Service. 1.
Sri Vijaykumar Nandiyala s/o Late Apolio Nandiyala age 41 yrs,Occpation Private service. 1.
Sri Maryadas s/o Late Apllo Nandiyala age 40 yrs , Occupation Private Service. 1.
Sri George Sundersingh s/o Late Appollo Nandiyala,Occupation Private service, 1.
Sri Nandiyala Stanly Premkumar s/o Late Apollo Nandiyala,age 34 yrs,Occupatio Medical Practitioner.
Respondent(s)
Shri Cleopas s/o Rajamni Malla,Occupation WCPM employee.
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 06-03-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 25-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 11-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 29-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
In this O.S. No. 293-2024 civil suit order dated 23-06-2025, the plaintiff's affidavit evidence and documentary exhibits (including sworn statements, Aadhar card copies, tax receipts, and day-book publication) were admitted by the court. The defendant did not present any counter-evidence as they appeared ex-parte (unrepresented). The court directed that a decree be passed in favor of the plaintiff based on the admitted evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
In this O.S. No. 293-2024 civil suit order dated 23-06-2025, the plaintiff's affidavit evidence and documentary exhibits (including sworn statements, Aadhar card copies, tax receipts, and day-book publication) were admitted by the court. The defendant did not present any counter-evidence as they appeared ex-parte (unrepresented). The court directed that a decree be passed in favor of the plaintiff based on the admitted evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts