THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DANDELI TOWN PS vs Hajarat Ali Mahemmed Yusuf Sakli Age 39 yers, R/o Patel Nagar,Dandeli — 714/2025
Case under Karnataka Police Act Section 87. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY/ PLEA BARGAINING on 06th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK410014202025
e-Filing Number
19-12-2025
Filing Number
644/2025
Filing Date
19-12-2025
Registration No
714/2025
Registration Date
19-12-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Decision Date
06th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY/ PLEA BARGAINING
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY DANDELI TOWN PS (Police Station)
Respondent(s)
Hajarat Ali Mahemmed Yusuf Sakli Age 39 yers, R/o Patel Nagar,Dandeli
ImamHusain Shoukat Ali Murtaza Age 40 years, R/o Patelanagar,Dandeli
Adv. null
Manjunath Virabhadra Harijan Age 30 yeras, R/o Gandhinagar,Dandeli
Adv. null
Rijwan Abbdul Nadaf Age 32 years R/o Gandhinagar,Dandeli
Adv. null
Balaraj Nagesh Giriyal Age 23 years R/o Subhas Nagar,Dandeli
Adv. null
Mohammed Rajak Sattar Thashildar Age 42 R/o Govntona,Dandeli
Adv. null
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Disposed
SUMMONS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 19-12-2025 | SUMMONS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: In case CC 714/2025, the Civil Judge of Dandli convicted six accused persons (Accused No. 1-6) under Section 87 of the KP Act after they pleaded guilty. Each accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with a default provision of 15 days simple imprisonment. The case was subsequently closed after all accused paid the imposed fines in full. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: In case CC 714/2025, the Civil Judge of Dandli convicted six accused persons (Accused No. 1-6) under Section 87 of the KP Act after they pleaded guilty. Each accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 300, with a default provision of 15 days simple imprisonment. The case was subsequently closed after all accused paid the imposed fines in full. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts