Akshay Co-operative Credit Society Ltd, Karwar Taluka Karwar District Uttar kannada vs Vishnu S/o Anand Dabali — 1065/2022

Case under 138 Ni Act 1881 Section 138 N.I Act. Disposed: Contested--CONVICTED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK410013952022

Filing Number

1065/2022

Filing Date

22-Apr-2022

Registration No

1065/2022

Registration Date

22-Apr-2022

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI

Judge

524-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--CONVICTED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

138 Ni Act 1881 Section 138 N.I Act

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Akshay Co-operative Credit Society Ltd, Karwar Taluka Karwar District Uttar kannada

    Adv. MCH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vishnu S/o Anand Dabali

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudgmentView PDF

    Case Summary: C.C.No.1065/2022 Court Decision: The accused Vishnu S/o Anand Dabali was found guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of ₹1,75,000 towards repayment of a loan from Akshaya Co-operative Credit Society. The court convicted him to pay a fine of ₹2,40,000 and undergo 6 months simple imprisonment, with ₹2,30,000 of the fine as compensation to the complainant society. Key Reasoning: The complainant proved through documentary evidence that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds and a legal notice was served but payment was not made. The accused failed to cross-examine the complainant's witness or present any defense, allowing the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act to remain unrebutted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  4. 27-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Judgement

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  7. 30-Jan-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  8. 19-Jan-2026

    Defence Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  9. 09-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  10. 30-Dec-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  11. 19-Dec-2025

    NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  12. 21-Nov-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  13. 14-Nov-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  14. 05-Nov-2025

    Accussed Statement u/s 313 CrPC

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  15. 15-Oct-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  16. 15-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  17. 06-Sep-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  18. 04-Sep-2025

    NBW

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  19. 21-Aug-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  20. 21-Apr-2025

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  21. 17-Feb-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  22. 29-Jan-2025

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  23. 07-Dec-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  24. 27-Sep-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  25. 09-Aug-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  26. 22-Jun-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  27. 31-May-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  28. 27-Apr-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  29. 15-Mar-2024

    DepositionView PDF

  30. 15-Mar-2024

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  31. 02-Mar-2024

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  32. 03-Feb-2024

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  33. 22-Dec-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  34. 24-Nov-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  35. 02-Nov-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  36. 27-Oct-2023

    A.D.R.

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  37. 16-Sep-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  38. 05-Aug-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  39. 28-Jun-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  40. 13-Apr-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  41. 17-Feb-2023

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  42. 22-Dec-2022

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  43. 28-Oct-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  44. 08-Sep-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  45. 02-Aug-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  46. 26-Jul-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  47. 25-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  48. 22-Jul-2022

    Appearance Of Accussed

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  49. 13-Jun-2022

    Framing Of Charge Or Plea

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  50. 22-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  51. 22-Apr-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1065/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: C.C.No.1065/2022 Court Decision: The accused Vishnu S/o Anand Dabali was found guilty under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for issuing a dishonored cheque of ₹1,75,000 towards repayment of a loan from Akshaya Co-operative Credit Society. The court convicted him to pay a fine of ₹2,40,000 and undergo 6 months simple imprisonment, with ₹2,30,000 of the fine as compensation to the complainant society. Key Reasoning: The complainant proved through documentary evidence that the cheque was dishonored due to insufficient funds and a legal notice was served but payment was not made. The accused failed to cross-examine the complainant's witness or present any defense, allowing the statutory presumption under Section 139 of the N.I. Act to remain unrebutted. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case