Ayubkhan S/o Ahmedkhan Khan vs Mehbood Dastagir Bagi — 208/2025

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1,2. Status: Judgments. Next hearing: 26th March 2026.

Judgments Next hearing 26-Mar-2026 this date has passed

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK410013192025

Filing Number

208/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

208/2025

Registration Date

06-Dec-2025

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI

Judge

524-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

Last updated 19-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 7rule1,2

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Ayubkhan S/o Ahmedkhan Khan

    Adv. MUSHTAQ AHAMED ABDULLA SHAIK

  2. 2.Mulla Reshmabanu D/o Ahmed Khan

  3. 3.Sahera D/o Ahmed Khan

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Mehbood Dastagir Bagi

Case History

  1. 26-Mar-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-Mar-2026

    Judgments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  3. 10-Feb-2026

    DepositionView PDF

    Summary: In O.S. 208/2025, the court recorded the plaintiff's sworn testimony on 10-02-2026 along with documentary evidence including two affidavits, five notarized Aadhaar card copies, bank passbook, and two daily newspapers. The court found all evidence presented by the plaintiff's counsel to be genuine. Since the defendant did not appear to contest the case, no party opposition was recorded, and the matter is proceeding based on the plaintiff's uncontested evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    Arguments

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  5. 22-Jan-2026

    Evidence

    CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli

  6. 08-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 208/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In O.S. 208/2025, the court recorded the plaintiff's sworn testimony on 10-02-2026 along with documentary evidence including two affidavits, five notarized Aadhaar card copies, bank passbook, and two daily newspapers. The court found all evidence presented by the plaintiff's counsel to be genuine. Since the defendant did not appear to contest the case, no party opposition was recorded, and the matter is proceeding based on the plaintiff's uncontested evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case