Sri.Chatrapati Shivaji Vividhoddeshagala Sahakri Sangh Niyamit Haliyal UK R/by its banch Manager of vs Sri.Sudharshan Devadas Borkar R/o.Vanashree Nagar Dandeli Tq.Dandeli UK — 744/2020
Case under U/sec. 200 of Crpc and U/sec.142 of N.i.act 1881 Section 326. Disposed: Contested--ACQUITTED on 13th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK410012312020
Filing Number
744/2020
Filing Date
09-10-2020
Registration No
744/2020
Registration Date
09-10-2020
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Decision Date
13th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ACQUITTED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri.Chatrapati Shivaji Vividhoddeshagala Sahakri Sangh Niyamit Haliyal UK R/by its banch Manager of
Adv. ROOPA MAHADEV KERWADKAR,
Respondent(s)
Sri.Sudharshan Devadas Borkar R/o.Vanashree Nagar Dandeli Tq.Dandeli UK
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
ARGUMENTS
ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 13-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 27-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 13-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
| 05-02-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
| 23-01-2026 | ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: C.C.No.744/2020 Court Decision: The accused, Sri. Sudharshan Devadas Borkar, was acquitted of the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Although the court found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a dishonored cheque for ₹82,310 toward loan repayment, it acquitted him because he settled the matter out of court by paying the full amount before judgment was pronounced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Case Summary: C.C.No.744/2020 Court Decision: The accused, Sri. Sudharshan Devadas Borkar, was acquitted of the offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Although the court found sufficient evidence that the accused issued a dishonored cheque for ₹82,310 toward loan repayment, it acquitted him because he settled the matter out of court by paying the full amount before judgment was pronounced. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts