Smt.Lalita Nayak W/o Ramachandra Nayak 61 yrs Rtd.Teacher R/o H.No. 245/B Township Dandeli vs Vishwanath S/o Laxman Kaltodkar 68 yrs Rtd.person R/o Mehaboob Subhani Darga Galli Marutinagar Dand — 214/2017
Case under Order 7 Rule 1 Cpc Section 62. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 05th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK410011372017
Next Hearing
05th June 2026
Filing Number
214/2017
Filing Date
25-10-2017
Registration No
214/2017
Registration Date
25-10-2017
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Smt.Lalita Nayak W/o Ramachandra Nayak 61 yrs Rtd.Teacher R/o H.No. 245/B Township Dandeli
Adv. MAHABALESHWAR CHANDRASHEKAR HEGDE
Respondent(s)
Vishwanath S/o Laxman Kaltodkar 68 yrs Rtd.person R/o Mehaboob Subhani Darga Galli Marutinagar Dand
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
ORDERS
ORDERS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 16-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 04-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
| 13-03-2026 | ORDERS |
Interim Orders
Summary of O.S. 214/2017 This is a civil suit concerning a property transaction dispute between Smt. Lalita Nayak (petitioner) and Vishwanath S/o Laxman Kaltodkar (respondent). The case involves allegations regarding a sale deed and Rs. 5,000 received by the petitioner's father, with disputes over property transfer documentation and a subsequent Rs. 4,000 loan transaction. On 13-02-2026, the court heard witness testimony and examined documentary evidence. The court found that the respondent's defense contained contradictory statements and false assertions regarding the sale deed execution and circumstances of the transaction. The case was adjourned for further hearing/proceedings, with directions noted regarding the examination of evidence and witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of O.S. 214/2017 This is a civil suit concerning a property transaction dispute between Smt. Lalita Nayak (petitioner) and Vishwanath S/o Laxman Kaltodkar (respondent). The case involves allegations regarding a sale deed and Rs. 5,000 received by the petitioner's father, with disputes over property transfer documentation and a subsequent Rs. 4,000 loan transaction. On 13-02-2026, the court heard witness testimony and examined documentary evidence. The court found that the respondent's defense contained contradictory statements and false assertions regarding the sale deed execution and circumstances of the transaction. The case was adjourned for further hearing/proceedings, with directions noted regarding the examination of evidence and witness statements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts