State of Karnataka vs BILAL S/O JAILANI SHMASHER OCCU.DRIVER HOUSE NO 208 MASIDIGALLI BEEDI KHANAPUR BELAGAVI — 355/2017

Case under 279 304 (a) Ipc Section 251. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 24th March 2026.

C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES

CNR: KAUK410009812017

JUDGEMENT

Next Hearing

24th March 2026

Filing Number

355/2017

Filing Date

11-09-2017

Registration No

355/2017

Registration Date

11-09-2017

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI

Judge

524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI

Acts & Sections

279 304 (a) Ipc Section 251

Petitioner(s)

State of Karnataka

Respondent(s)

BILAL S/O JAILANI SHMASHER OCCU.DRIVER HOUSE NO 208 MASIDIGALLI BEEDI KHANAPUR BELAGAVI

Hearing History

Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI

06-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

28-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

24-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

10-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

Interim Orders

19-03-2018
Plea
04-06-2024
Deposition
20-12-2025
Deposition
13-01-2026
Deposition

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 355/2017, a witness was examined on 13-01-2026 before the First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Dandeli. The witness testified regarding an accident involving a truck (KM-01/M-899) and a two-wheeler (KM-31/Q-9273) that occurred on 07-06-2017, but stated he did not directly witness the collision and could not identify who caused the accident. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution and cross-examination was permitted; no further cross-examination by the defense was conducted, and the case was adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: In Criminal Case No. 355/2017, a witness was examined on 13-01-2026 before the First Class Judicial Magistrate's Court in Dandeli. The witness testified regarding an accident involving a truck (KM-01/M-899) and a two-wheeler (KM-31/Q-9273) that occurred on 07-06-2017, but stated he did not directly witness the collision and could not identify who caused the accident. The witness was declared hostile by the prosecution and cross-examination was permitted; no further cross-examination by the defense was conducted, and the case was adjourned. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case