Anil Krishna Medha,age 41 yrs. vs Mahantesh Krishnappa Lamani — 461/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Status: Mediation. Next hearing: 25th March 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK410007212025
Next Hearing
25th March 2026
e-Filing Number
12-06-2025
Filing Number
61/2025
Filing Date
16-06-2025
Registration No
461/2025
Registration Date
17-06-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Anil Krishna Medha,age 41 yrs.
Adv. Komal Shinde
Respondent(s)
Mahantesh Krishnappa Lamani
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 06-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 27-02-2026 | Mediation |
| 24-02-2026 | Mediation |
| 18-02-2026 | Mediation |
| 28-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 461/2025 Case Type: Civil case before Civil Judge and JMMFC Court, Dandeli Parties: - Plaintiff: Sri Anil Krishna Medha (age 41) - Defendant: Sri Mahantesh Krishna Lamani (age 35) Outcome: Case adjourned to 28.01.2026. The defendant was read and explained the charges in Kannada (related to issuing a cheque for Rs. 5,89,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds on 07.04.2025, allegedly constituting an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act). The defendant's responses to the charges were recorded, and the matter stands for further proceedings on the adjourned date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 461/2025 Case Type: Civil case before Civil Judge and JMMFC Court, Dandeli Parties: - Plaintiff: Sri Anil Krishna Medha (age 41) - Defendant: Sri Mahantesh Krishna Lamani (age 35) Outcome: Case adjourned to 28.01.2026. The defendant was read and explained the charges in Kannada (related to issuing a cheque for Rs. 5,89,000 that bounced due to insufficient funds on 07.04.2025, allegedly constituting an offense under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act). The defendant's responses to the charges were recorded, and the matter stands for further proceedings on the adjourned date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Explore other courts