Sri. Premkumar S/o. Jnanayudam Perumal vs Smt. Marakka W/o. Konappa Harijan — 103/2024

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISED FOR DEFAULT on 04th June 2026.

O.S. - Original Suit

CNR: KAUK410006492024

Case disposed

Filing Number

103/2024

Filing Date

02-05-2024

Registration No

103/2024

Registration Date

02-05-2024

Court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI

Judge

524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI

Decision Date

04th June 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISMISED FOR DEFAULT

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRule1

Petitioner(s)

Sri. Premkumar S/o. Jnanayudam Perumal

Adv. V.P. Perumala

Smt. Sarojamma W/o. Premkumar Perumal

Respondent(s)

Smt. Marakka W/o. Konappa Harijan

Sri. Timmappa S/o. Konappa Harijan

Sri. Shrinivas S/o. Konappa Harijan

Hearing History

Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI

04-06-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

EVIDENCE

29-01-2026

EVIDENCE

11-12-2025

EVIDENCE

17-09-2025

EVIDENCE

Interim Orders

04-02-2025
Orders

Case Summary: OS 103/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendants from constructing a structure without proper setbacks on the northern side of their property. The court held that setback disputes fall within the municipal commissioner's jurisdiction, not the civil court's, and that the plaintiffs failed to provide clear property descriptions required for injunction relief. Key Reasoning: The court applied the precedent from *Dr. K. Panduranga Nayak v. Smt. Jayashree* (AIR 1990 KANT 236), establishing that construction setback violations are administrative matters under municipal law, making a civil suit for injunction inappropriate when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: OS 103/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendants from constructing a structure without proper setbacks on the northern side of their property. The court held that setback disputes fall within the municipal commissioner's jurisdiction, not the civil court's, and that the plaintiffs failed to provide clear property descriptions required for injunction relief. Key Reasoning: The court applied the precedent from *Dr. K. Panduranga Nayak v. Smt. Jayashree* (AIR 1990 KANT 236), establishing that construction setback violations are administrative matters under municipal law, making a civil suit for injunction inappropriate when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case