Sri. Premkumar S/o. Jnanayudam Perumal vs Smt. Marakka W/o. Konappa Harijan — 103/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISED FOR DEFAULT on 04th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK410006492024
Filing Number
103/2024
Filing Date
02-May-2024
Registration No
103/2024
Registration Date
02-May-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
Decision Date
04-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISED FOR DEFAULT
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Sri. Premkumar S/o. Jnanayudam Perumal
Adv. V.P. Perumala
-
2.Smt. Sarojamma W/o. Premkumar Perumal
Respondent(s)
-
1.Smt. Marakka W/o. Konappa Harijan
-
2.Sri. Timmappa S/o. Konappa Harijan
-
3.Sri. Shrinivas S/o. Konappa Harijan
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-Jun-2026
Disposed
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
13-Mar-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
29-Jan-2026
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
11-Dec-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
17-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
04-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
01-Sep-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
06-Aug-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
25-Jun-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
09-Apr-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
04-Feb-2025
OrdersView PDF
Case Summary: OS 103/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendants from constructing a structure without proper setbacks on the northern side of their property. The court held that setback disputes fall within the municipal commissioner's jurisdiction, not the civil court's, and that the plaintiffs failed to provide clear property descriptions required for injunction relief. Key Reasoning: The court applied the precedent from *Dr. K. Panduranga Nayak v. Smt. Jayashree* (AIR 1990 KANT 236), establishing that construction setback violations are administrative matters under municipal law, making a civil suit for injunction inappropriate when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-Feb-2025
Evidence
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
15-Jan-2025
Orders
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
09-Jan-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
06-Jan-2025
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
02-Dec-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
11-Nov-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
25-Oct-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
05-Sep-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
19-Jul-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
04-Jul-2024
Hearing
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
21-Jun-2024
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
18-Jun-2024
Arguments
CIVIL Judge And JMFC Court, Dandeli
-
03-Jun-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
02-May-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 103/2024
Case Summary: OS 103/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendants from constructing a structure without proper setbacks on the northern side of their property. The court held that setback disputes fall within the municipal commissioner's jurisdiction, not the civil court's, and that the plaintiffs failed to provide clear property descriptions required for injunction relief. Key Reasoning: The court applied the precedent from *Dr. K. Panduranga Nayak v. Smt. Jayashree* (AIR 1990 KANT 236), establishing that construction setback violations are administrative matters under municipal law, making a civil suit for injunction inappropriate when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts