Sri. Premkumar S/o. Jnanayudam Perumal vs Smt. Marakka W/o. Konappa Harijan — 103/2024
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section VIIRule1. Disposed: Uncontested--DISMISED FOR DEFAULT on 04th June 2026.
O.S. - Original Suit
CNR: KAUK410006492024
Filing Number
103/2024
Filing Date
02-05-2024
Registration No
103/2024
Registration Date
02-05-2024
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Decision Date
04th June 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--DISMISED FOR DEFAULT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Sri. Premkumar S/o. Jnanayudam Perumal
Adv. V.P. Perumala
Smt. Sarojamma W/o. Premkumar Perumal
Respondent(s)
Smt. Marakka W/o. Konappa Harijan
Sri. Timmappa S/o. Konappa Harijan
Sri. Shrinivas S/o. Konappa Harijan
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
Disposed
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-06-2026 | Disposed |
| 13-03-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 29-01-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 11-12-2025 | EVIDENCE |
| 17-09-2025 | EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: OS 103/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendants from constructing a structure without proper setbacks on the northern side of their property. The court held that setback disputes fall within the municipal commissioner's jurisdiction, not the civil court's, and that the plaintiffs failed to provide clear property descriptions required for injunction relief. Key Reasoning: The court applied the precedent from *Dr. K. Panduranga Nayak v. Smt. Jayashree* (AIR 1990 KANT 236), establishing that construction setback violations are administrative matters under municipal law, making a civil suit for injunction inappropriate when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: OS 103/2024 Court Decision: The court dismissed the plaintiffs' interim injunction application seeking to restrain defendants from constructing a structure without proper setbacks on the northern side of their property. The court held that setback disputes fall within the municipal commissioner's jurisdiction, not the civil court's, and that the plaintiffs failed to provide clear property descriptions required for injunction relief. Key Reasoning: The court applied the precedent from *Dr. K. Panduranga Nayak v. Smt. Jayashree* (AIR 1990 KANT 236), establishing that construction setback violations are administrative matters under municipal law, making a civil suit for injunction inappropriate when statutory remedies exist. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts