Subhash S/o Late Ramu Bhovi, age 45 yrs. vs Smt.Tabassum w/o Gous Khan.age 41 yrs, — 424/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 223. Status: EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
C.C. - CRIMINAL CASES
CNR: KAUK410006222025
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
e-Filing Number
17-04-2025
Filing Number
50/2025
Filing Date
22-04-2025
Registration No
424/2025
Registration Date
22-04-2025
Court
CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, DANDELI
Judge
524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
FIR Details
Police Station
DANDELI TOWN PS
Year
0
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Subhash S/o Late Ramu Bhovi, age 45 yrs.
Adv. LAKSHETTI VISHWANATH YALAGURAPPA
Respondent(s)
Smt.Tabassum w/o Gous Khan.age 41 yrs,
Hearing History
Judge: 524-CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, DANDELI
EVIDENCE
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
Mediation
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 24-04-2026 | EVIDENCE |
| 01-04-2026 | Mediation |
| 25-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 13-03-2026 | Mediation |
| 27-02-2026 | Mediation |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: CC 424/2025 Court: Civil Judge and District Court, Dandeli Parties: Subhash S/o Late Ramu Bhovi (Petitioner) vs. Smt. Tabassum w/o Gous Khan (Respondent) Issue: Cheque bounce case under Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. Petitioner claims respondent borrowed ₹2,00,000, issued cheque no. 574644 dated 04.03.2025, which was returned on 06.03.2025 with "Insufficient Fund" marking. Despite notice issued on 21.03.2025, respondent allegedly failed to pay. Order: Case adjourned to 17.10.2025 for respondent to file written statement and evidence. Court posed two issues for determination: (1) whether cheque was issued for debt repayment, and (2) whether respondent intentionally caused dishonor with knowledge of insufficient funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: CC 424/2025 Court: Civil Judge and District Court, Dandeli Parties: Subhash S/o Late Ramu Bhovi (Petitioner) vs. Smt. Tabassum w/o Gous Khan (Respondent) Issue: Cheque bounce case under Negotiable Instruments Act, Section 138. Petitioner claims respondent borrowed ₹2,00,000, issued cheque no. 574644 dated 04.03.2025, which was returned on 06.03.2025 with "Insufficient Fund" marking. Despite notice issued on 21.03.2025, respondent allegedly failed to pay. Order: Case adjourned to 17.10.2025 for respondent to file written statement and evidence. Court posed two issues for determination: (1) whether cheque was issued for debt repayment, and (2) whether respondent intentionally caused dishonor with knowledge of insufficient funds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts